2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the mechanism of activation of cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) by cAMP in Escherichia coli: Lessons from a subunit‐crosslinked form of CRP

Abstract: a b s t r a c tCyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP), the global transcription regulator in prokaryotes, is active only as a cAMP-CRP complex. Binding of cAMP changes the conformation of CRP, transforming it from a transcriptionally 'inactive' to an 'active' molecule. These conformers are also characterized by distinct biochemical properties including the ability to form an S-S crosslink between the C178 residues of its two monomeric subunits. We studied a CRP variant (CRP cl ), in which the subunits are cros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the expressed mRNA and protein level of both crp or cra does not change significantly during growth on glucose, fructose, or acetate ( Supplementary Figure S10 , Supplementary Figure S11 ). Therefore, the regulatory activity of CRP could be strongly dependent on the concentration of its effector molecule, cAMP, as suggested in the previous study with in vitro experiment ( 52 ). The intracellular concentration of cAMP is lowest on glucose, and higher on fructose.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Interestingly, the expressed mRNA and protein level of both crp or cra does not change significantly during growth on glucose, fructose, or acetate ( Supplementary Figure S10 , Supplementary Figure S11 ). Therefore, the regulatory activity of CRP could be strongly dependent on the concentration of its effector molecule, cAMP, as suggested in the previous study with in vitro experiment ( 52 ). The intracellular concentration of cAMP is lowest on glucose, and higher on fructose.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The evidence that both mutants, Δ crp (Q-type) and Δ crp (R-type), shared some common target genes (13.3% in the up-regulated genes, 16% in the down-regulated genes, Figure 4 ) during the exponential phase was somewhat unexpected. A first, simple interpretation of this phenomenon could suggest that transcription of these sets of genes does not depend on the acetylation stage of CRP, but rather on the presence of several conformer complexes between c-AMP and CRP (Heyduk and Lee, 1989 ; Mukhopadhyay et al, 1999 ; Tworzydło et al, 2005 ; Tutar, 2008 ; Saha et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the crp gene has two binding sites for the CRP protein, a stimulatory one located upstream of the promoter, and an inhibitory one located downstream of the promoter (Ishizuka et al, 1994 ). CRP is not really what is bound, but rather the cAMP-CRP complex (Saha et al, 2015 ) (see Figure 6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include reorientation of the DNA-binding domain and stabilization of the backbone helix, but the two different structures do not agree on the orientation of the C-terminal domain. This observation, and the limited number of published apo CRP structures, suggests that apoCRP may be unstable due to flexibility of the C-terminal domain [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%