2021
DOI: 10.3390/life11020161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Instrumented Romberg Test: Can Today’s Technology Offer a Risk-of-Fall Screening Device for Senior Citizens? An Experience-Based Approach

Abstract: Risk of fall (ROF) is a worldwide major concern for its prevalence and consequent dramatic outcomes in the elderly population. The growing age-related risk appears to be associated with increasing motor, sensory, and cognitive problems in the elderly population. There is a consensus on the need to screen for these balance dysfunctions, but the available methods are largely based on subjectively assessed performances. The instrumented Romberg test using a force plate represents a validated assessment process fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, four athletes exhibit hypertonic postural behaviour, while the other four exhibit hypotonic behaviours. The value of SL/SA was out of the normative reference range, suggesting an anomalous relationship between the SL and SA of the COP displacement [15]. A hypertonic postural behaviour with an SL/SA ratio exceeding 1.5 leads to increased energy expenditure, which could negatively influence performance and fatigue, conversely, with participants showing a hypotonic behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, four athletes exhibit hypertonic postural behaviour, while the other four exhibit hypotonic behaviours. The value of SL/SA was out of the normative reference range, suggesting an anomalous relationship between the SL and SA of the COP displacement [15]. A hypertonic postural behaviour with an SL/SA ratio exceeding 1.5 leads to increased energy expenditure, which could negatively influence performance and fatigue, conversely, with participants showing a hypotonic behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The percentual distribution of the body weight on the 4 quadrants of the stabilometric platform was investigated to evaluate the possible presence of clinically significant postural alterations (i.e., repartition of the body weight between the left and right quadrants >10%) [14]. Concerning the postural parameters, the ratio sway length/sway area (SL/SA) for each participant was also assessed and compared with normative reference data to evaluate the possible presence of clinically significant postural alterations: this ratio is proportional to postural tone and a value under 1.5 can suggest a hypertonic postural tone, whilst a value over 3 can suggest a hypotonic postural tone [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fall screening and prediction: Falls are identified as a significant cause of injury in individuals with CA [192]. In an effort to provide a non-invasive screening platform, work by Gallamini and colleagues suggested employing a standing platform and Romberg's balance test to investigate the risk of falling [193]. Falls prediction employed the traditional approach to search for linkage between a signal's features and a fall.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample consisted of 195 healthy young volunteers, 119 of whom were elite athletes [16] and was subsequently extended to a total of 1212 normofunctional individuals. Since then we have collected several thousand test results during our routine clinical practice, investigations which included a specific test to explore the feasibility of using the Romberg test as a screening tool for balance deficits [17], and we noticed the as-yet unreported relationship between the harmonic analysis and the position of what could perhaps be described as an irritative focus. It was only during a recent discussion of the topic that the co-authors of this paper came to exchange experiences and comments which led to the definition of the present medical hypothesis.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%