2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09866.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the infrared spectra of active galactic nuclei with a new torus emission model

Abstract: We describe improved modelling of the emission by dust in a toroidal-like structure heated by a central illuminating source within active galactic nuclei (AGNs). We have chosen a simple but realistic torus geometry, a flared disc, and a dust grain distribution function including a full range of grain sizes. The optical depth within the torus is computed in detail taking into account the different sublimation temperatures of the silicate and graphite grains, which solves previously reported inconsistencies in t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
907
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 574 publications
(928 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
20
907
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When discussing these models, it's important to keep in mind that the accuracy or applicability of these models cannot be tested with data since it simply does not exist in enough detail to disentangle effects of geometry, distribution, optical depth, etc. It's also important to note that many have done work in this area, particularly modeling radiative transfer in local starburst populations to generate SEDs (Efstathiou & Rowan-Robinson, 1995;Efstathiou et al, 2000;Efstathiou & Siebenmorgen, 2009;Nenkova et al, 2002;Dullemond & van Bemmel, 2005;Piovan et al, 2006;Nenkova et al, 2008;Takagi et al, 2003;Fritz et al, 2006;Hönig et al, 2006;Schartmann et al, 2008), but here we try to focus on the techniques which have been most commonly employed for SED fitting of high-z dusty starbursts 11 . Silva et al (1998) developed the Grasil code to model galaxy emission by explicitly accounting for dust absorption and emission from the ultraviolet through to the far-infrared.…”
Section: Employing Dust Radiative Transfer Models and Empirical Templmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When discussing these models, it's important to keep in mind that the accuracy or applicability of these models cannot be tested with data since it simply does not exist in enough detail to disentangle effects of geometry, distribution, optical depth, etc. It's also important to note that many have done work in this area, particularly modeling radiative transfer in local starburst populations to generate SEDs (Efstathiou & Rowan-Robinson, 1995;Efstathiou et al, 2000;Efstathiou & Siebenmorgen, 2009;Nenkova et al, 2002;Dullemond & van Bemmel, 2005;Piovan et al, 2006;Nenkova et al, 2008;Takagi et al, 2003;Fritz et al, 2006;Hönig et al, 2006;Schartmann et al, 2008), but here we try to focus on the techniques which have been most commonly employed for SED fitting of high-z dusty starbursts 11 . Silva et al (1998) developed the Grasil code to model galaxy emission by explicitly accounting for dust absorption and emission from the ultraviolet through to the far-infrared.…”
Section: Employing Dust Radiative Transfer Models and Empirical Templmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A power-law extension of the restframe optical disk emission into the NIR is a common assumption for the primary source that is used as input for radiative transfer codes that model the torus emission (e.g. Granato & Danese 1994;Nenkova et al 2002;Fritz et al 2006;Stalevski et al 2012), but it is not universal. In particular, some torus models assume a steep fall of the disk spectrum longwards of 1 µm (e.g.…”
Section: Modelling Of the Continuum Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectral energy distribution (SED) of PID352 was modeled using the SED-fitting code originally developed by Fritz et al (2006) and recently updated by Feltre et al (2012), and assuming z = 1.60 as derived from our X-ray spectral analysis. We note that, within the errors, the X-ray-derived redshift is consistent with both current photometric-redshift estimates (Taylor et al 2009;Hsu et al 2014), and it is currently the one with the lowest uncertainties.…”
Section: Spectral Energy Distribution Of Pid352mentioning
confidence: 99%