2021
DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Implications of Positive Germline Testing Results Using Multi-gene Panels in Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract: Background/Aim: The use of multi-gene panels for germline testing in breast cancer enables the estimation of cancer risk and guides risk-reducing management options. The aim of this study was to present data that demonstrate the different levels of actionability for multi-gene panels used in genetic testing of breast cancer patients and their family members. Materials and Methods:We performed an analysis in our clinical database to identify breast cancer patients undergoing genetic testing. We reviewed positiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The biological significance of genetic variants and their implications for cancer risk render an essential role in medical diagnosis and treatment. In circumstances where a genetic variant is a matter of controversy or has doubt regarding its clinical consequences, it will be crucial to raise the concern in the appropriate outcome report [ 25 ]. In the case we presented, the patient had a history of a partial oophorectomy, so during the initial post-test genetic counseling and in contemplating a molecular result related to LS, the possibility of performing a contralateral-oophorectomy was evaluated according to management guidelines [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biological significance of genetic variants and their implications for cancer risk render an essential role in medical diagnosis and treatment. In circumstances where a genetic variant is a matter of controversy or has doubt regarding its clinical consequences, it will be crucial to raise the concern in the appropriate outcome report [ 25 ]. In the case we presented, the patient had a history of a partial oophorectomy, so during the initial post-test genetic counseling and in contemplating a molecular result related to LS, the possibility of performing a contralateral-oophorectomy was evaluated according to management guidelines [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advances in DNA sequencing technologies and the decreased costs of genetic assays lead to expressive increase in the number of genes incorporated in genetic testing for BC risk prediction ( 20 ). Most gene panels include high-penetrance genes, such as BRCA1 , BRCA2 , CDH1 , PALB2 , PTEN , STK11 , and TP53 , and moderate-penetrance genes, such as ATM , BRIP1 , CHEK2 , FANCD2 , RAD51C , NBN , and PMS2 , which also associates with lifetime BC risk ( 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Der Einsatz der NGS-Multi-Genpanel-Analyse im Rahmen der Keimbahnmutationstestung bei Brustkarzinom ermöglicht eine Abschätzung des Krebsrisikos und davon abgeleitete, risikominimierende therapeutische Maßnahmen. BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, PTEN und TP53 sind mit hohem, ATM, CHEK2 und NBN mit moderatem und MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, RAD51C mit niedrigem Brustkarzinomrisiko assoziiert [23].…”
Section: Merkeunclassified