2022
DOI: 10.1007/s43076-022-00214-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Factor Structure of the Ruminative Response Scale: a Bifactor Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the present study, only the 5 items of the brooding dimension were used, which has shown a clearer association with psychopathology (Takano & Tanno, 2009). The Spanish version used is an adaptation of an existing version (Cova et al, 2009) and its detailed psychometric properties have been presented elsewhere (Valencia & Paredes-Angeles, 2022). Specifically, the brooding dimension was found to have a stronger association with depression, even independently of the effect of a general rumination factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For the present study, only the 5 items of the brooding dimension were used, which has shown a clearer association with psychopathology (Takano & Tanno, 2009). The Spanish version used is an adaptation of an existing version (Cova et al, 2009) and its detailed psychometric properties have been presented elsewhere (Valencia & Paredes-Angeles, 2022). Specifically, the brooding dimension was found to have a stronger association with depression, even independently of the effect of a general rumination factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%