2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Dutch disease thesis from the perspective of value-added trade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Economic diversification is commonly proposed as the primary strategy to counter the resource curse in developing countries [ 27 , 29 ]. The underlying idea is to expand the productive capacity of sectors other than natural resources.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerations and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic diversification is commonly proposed as the primary strategy to counter the resource curse in developing countries [ 27 , 29 ]. The underlying idea is to expand the productive capacity of sectors other than natural resources.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerations and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Chang et al (2021), the Dutch disease literature commonly uses output growth or the share of output in GDP across sectors to detect symptoms of it, e.g. an appreciated real exchange rates.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical real exchange rate models for developing economies consider it as an endogenous variable determined in a complete macroeconomic system where macroeconomic fundamentals are key driving variables underlying its movements. Rather than focusing on real exchange rates, Dutch disease models analyse the role of the fundamentals on the size of the tradable and non-tradable sectors and emphasize that appreciated real exchange rates induce resource allocation favorable to sectors other than the industrial sectors; they consider thus real exchange rate as a determinant of de-industrialization in developing economies; see Araujo et al (2021), Swan (1955), Salter (1959), Purvis (1982, 1983), Corden (1984), Sachs and Warner (1995), Fardmanesh (1990), Rodrik (2008), Rajan and Subramanian (2011), García-Cicco and Kawamura (2015), Mejalenko (2015) and Chang et al (2021) and Nülle and Davis (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison with traditional trade statistics, trade in value added reveals economic gains from trade and the effects of trade on the environment more accurately and comprehensively. The main reason is that traditional trade statistics only focus on export volume and ignore the share of value added in export products (Chang et al, 2021; Duval et al, 2016; Johnson & Noguera, 2012). The latter is important as processing trade accounts for almost half of China's total trade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%