2017
DOI: 10.23736/s0392-9590.16.03777-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the cost-effectiveness of screening 65-year-old men for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on data from an implemented screening program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent report, the Dutch Health Council did not advise routine population screening for AAA in the Netherlands after an extensive evaluation of existing trials and screening programs implemented worldwide (12). Although reports evaluating the existing large screening programs in England and Sweden do show clear benefits in terms of AAA-related mortality and low costs per quality-adjusted lifeyear (QALY) gained, the true prevalence of AAA in the screened groups turned out to be lower than expected (13)(14)(15)(16). Multiple recent reports show a decreasing prevalence of AAA (17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent report, the Dutch Health Council did not advise routine population screening for AAA in the Netherlands after an extensive evaluation of existing trials and screening programs implemented worldwide (12). Although reports evaluating the existing large screening programs in England and Sweden do show clear benefits in terms of AAA-related mortality and low costs per quality-adjusted lifeyear (QALY) gained, the true prevalence of AAA in the screened groups turned out to be lower than expected (13)(14)(15)(16). Multiple recent reports show a decreasing prevalence of AAA (17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%