2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2012.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Brewster Angle Microscopy: The relevance of the polar headgroup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Current interpretation ascribes to the head group the ruling role in determining the shapes of the domains, while chain length has only an impact on smaller details of their form . For the racemate no special shape is observed but rather a cholesteric texture …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current interpretation ascribes to the head group the ruling role in determining the shapes of the domains, while chain length has only an impact on smaller details of their form . For the racemate no special shape is observed but rather a cholesteric texture …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nevertheless, quantitative predictions of large‐scale chirality based on that at the molecular scale remains a debated problem whose solution requires sophisticated techniques . Considering that the shape of the domains is mainly determined by the interactions between the polar head groups, the morphological differences between figures d and e in Table strongly suggest that specific interactions (electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding) between the d ‐DPPC head groups and 1 take place. We could suppose that also the lipophilic chains, whose spatial arrangement is in turn influenced by the chiral polar head, contribute to the specific interaction altering the monolayer organization of one enantiomer with respect to the other and favoring homochiral interaction in condensed phases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This applies to some cases of bulky, radiation absorbing headgroups being weakly hydrated and as a result causing stronger modification of the water refracting index. 37 However, the last of the three scenarios should be rejected as an explanation for the molecules studied herein, since the headgroup of sterols, being the single hydroxyl, does not fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. On the other hand, to resolve unambiguously between the first two possibilities, i.e., whether the molecular tilt is responsible for the observed anisotropy, we must refer to the results acquired with the technique based on synchrotron radiation scattering.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…17 The BAM images shown in Scheme 1C were recorded with the camera polarizer (analyzer) at 0 . Thus, the monolayer is considered as a biaxial materials with the complex refractive indices of N q ¼ n q À ik q (q^x, y and z), where n q is the real part of the refractive index, and k q is the absorption coefficient of the monolayer (see details in the ESI †).…”
Section: The Origin Of the Domain Anisotropy Observed By Bam: In-planmentioning
confidence: 99%