2017
DOI: 10.1177/1043463117734177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Breen–Goldthorpe Model of educational stratification

Abstract: We present an extension of the classic rational choice model for educational decisions that is able to explain recent empirical findings by Gabay-Egozi et al. who established that Israeli students from disadvantaged social strata tend to hedge long-term utility with short-term risk when choosing among subjects for their matriculation exams. Adding to that, we show that the assumption of relative risk aversion as formulated in the Breen-Goldthorpe Model can be relaxed to a significant degree without losing its … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the model can easily incorporate more than two alternatives (e.g. an intermediate secondary school track), and it can be applied to sequential decisions via backward induction, such as choosing among secondary school tracks the one that maximises the chances of attaining a tertiary degree and reaching the upper class (Tutic, 2017).…”
Section: Two Critical Assumptions Of the Breen-goldthorpe Model Of Relative Risk-aversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, the model can easily incorporate more than two alternatives (e.g. an intermediate secondary school track), and it can be applied to sequential decisions via backward induction, such as choosing among secondary school tracks the one that maximises the chances of attaining a tertiary degree and reaching the upper class (Tutic, 2017).…”
Section: Two Critical Assumptions Of the Breen-goldthorpe Model Of Relative Risk-aversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second core assumption of the BG model is that educational decisions are exclusively driven by the concern to avoid downward mobility (Downward Mobility Assumption). This means that families would not differentiate between immobility, short-range upward mobility and long-range upward mobility (Tutic, 2017). For instance, for working-class parents, it would be indifferent that their children stay in the working class, reach white-collar jobs or upper-class jobs: the only relevant concern would be that they avoid descending into the unskilled jobs of the underclass.…”
Section: The Downward Mobility Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alternatively, it is possible that analysing those decision rules will require exploring factors which have been neglected by existing research. Research shows that decision making mechanisms depend not only on the motivational drivers, but also on the perceived ability to achieve the desired goal (Breen and Yaish, 2006; Tutić, 2017), including political ones (Craig, 1993; Gil de Zúñiga et al, 2017; Southwell, 2012). As important as this result is, existing research on the support for EU has neglected this aspect of decision making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%