Revisiting the bioacoustics of European spiny lobsters Palinurus elephas: comparison of antennal rasps in tanks and in situ

Jézéquel, Youenn; Bonnel, Julien; Coston‐Guarini, Jennifer; Chauvaud, Laurent

doi:10.3354/meps12935

Cited by 21 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 62 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Marine arthropods produce sounds that are mostly characterized by broadband pulses, i.e. short transient sounds with a large bandwidth [15][16][17] . Estimating their sound propagation may be challenging as they inhabit shallow coastal waters (at depths below tens of meters).…”

Section: Spiny Lobster Sounds Can Be Detectable Over Kilometres Undermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, tank acoustics are complicated. The relatively small volumes and close boundaries of tanks highly affect sound propagation as well as SL estimates 13,14 ; these tank effects have been largely ignored by most previous studies (as a counter example, see 15 for an experimental illustration on the differences of crustacean sounds recorded in tanks and in situ). Thus, there is a need to combine theory with empirical measurements of site-specific sound propagation to obtain reliable SL and TL predictions for estimating detection ranges of crustacean sounds.…”

Section: Spiny Lobster Sounds Can Be Detectable Over Kilometres Undermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While these antennal rasps are characterized by trains of broadband pulses with sound intensity spread over a wide bandwidth, their spectrums are dominated by low frequencies (i.e. below 1 kHz 15,25 ). In addition, it is possible to induce sound production by handling the animals underwater (which aims to imitate a predator attacking 15,16,25 ).…”

Section: Spiny Lobster Sounds Can Be Detectable Over Kilometres Undermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…below 1 kHz 15,25 ). In addition, it is possible to induce sound production by handling the animals underwater (which aims to imitate a predator attacking 15,16,25 ). Hence, these animals are practical for accurately measuring SL and propagation of produced sounds over different distances, while precisely controlling their positions.…”

Section: Spiny Lobster Sounds Can Be Detectable Over Kilometres Undermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As a result, these large individuals should be detectable over longer distances. In addition, a recent study 15 recorded antennal rasps from the European spiny lobster (Palinurus elephas) underwater and reported high peak-to-peak sound pressure levels (SPL) up to 170 dB re 1 µPa 2 at 20 cm from the animals. Such elevated SPLs imply these sounds could be detectable during in situ PAM studies, which is needed to better manage this highly commercially valuable and vulnerable species that has become scarce in European coastal waters due to overfishing 29,30 .…”

Section: Spiny Lobster Sounds Can Be Detectable Over Kilometres Undermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Spiny lobster sounds can be detectable over kilometres underwater

Jézéquel¹,

Chauvaud²,

Bonnel³

2020

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Spiny Lobster Sounds Can Be Detectable Over Kilometres Undermentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Spiny Lobster Sounds Can Be Detectable Over Kilometres Undermentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Spiny Lobster Sounds Can Be Detectable Over Kilometres Undermentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Spiny Lobster Sounds Can Be Detectable Over Kilometres Undermentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Spiny Lobster Sounds Can Be Detectable Over Kilometres Undermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Spiny lobster sounds can be detectable over kilometres underwater

Jézéquel¹,

Chauvaud²,

Bonnel³

2020

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Assessing the impacts of anthropogenic sounds on early stages of benthic invertebrates: The “Larvosonic system”

Olivier

Gigot

Mathias

et al. 2022

Limnology & Ocean Methods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Author Contribution Statement: F.O. conceived the experimental system and design, supervised and participated to the experiments, wrote the original draft, and reviewed the manuscript. M.G. conducted the experiments, acquired biological and acoustic data, performed their analyses, and reviewed the manuscript. D.M. performed initial acoustic recording, helped in their analyses, and reviewed the manuscript. Y.J. helped in acoustic recording and contributed to the manuscript review. T.M. supervised fatty acid analysis, contributed to results interpretation and manuscript review. C.L. provide the vector sensor and analyzed the particle motion data. L.C. conceived the experimental system, contributed to results interpretational, led the project administration and funding acquisition, and reviewed the manuscript. J.B.: supervised the acoustics analyses, contributed to results interpretation, and reviewed the manuscript.

show abstract

Analysis of Soundscapes as an Ecological Tool

Schoeman

Erbe

Pavan

et al. 2022

Exploring Animal Behavior Through Sound: Volume 1

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Soundscapes have been likened to acoustic landscapes, encompassing all the acoustic features of an area. The sounds that make up a soundscape can be grouped according to their source into biophony (sounds from animals), geophony (sounds from atmospheric and geophysical events), and anthropophony (sounds from human activities). Natural soundscapes have changed over time because of human activities that generate sound, alter land-use patterns, remove animals from natural settings, and result in climate change. These human activities have direct and indirect effects on animal distribution patterns and (acoustic) behavior. Consequently, current soundscapes may be very different from those a few hundred years ago. This is of concern as natural soundscapes have ecological value. Losing natural soundscapes may, therefore, result in a loss of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. The study of soundscapes can identify ecosystems undergoing change and potentially document causes (such as noise from human activities). Methods for studying soundscapes range from listening and creating visual (spectrographic) displays to the computation of acoustic indices and advanced statistical modeling. Passive acoustic recording has become an ecological tool for research, monitoring, and ultimately conservation management. This chapter introduces terrestrial and aquatic soundscapes, soundscape analysis tools, and soundscape management.

show abstract

Revisiting the bioacoustics of European spiny lobsters Palinurus elephas: comparison of antennal rasps in tanks and in situ

Cited by 21 publications

References 62 publications

Spiny lobster sounds can be detectable over kilometres underwater

Spiny lobster sounds can be detectable over kilometres underwater

Assessing the impacts of anthropogenic sounds on early stages of benthic invertebrates: The “Larvosonic system”

Analysis of Soundscapes as an Ecological Tool

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About