Abstract:: Many of the early studies that investigate the impact of exchange rate movements on domestic production report mixed findings in terms of the effect on economic growth. However, the majority of these studies had were limited in that they relied on a prior assumption of linear adjustment of the exchange rate fluctuations toward domestic output. We suspect that a prior assumption of linearity may mask the empirical results. We, therefore, bring nonlinearity into the adjustment process through the partial sum a… Show more
“…For instance, according to Bahmani‐Oskooee, Halicioglu, and Mohammadian (2018), both PREX and NREX have expansionary impacts on domestic output. Iqbal et al (2022) provide substantial evidence demonstrating the asymmetric impacts of exchange rate variations on domestic output, both in the short and long terms, across all economies studied. According to Bahmani‐Oskooee and Arize (2020), results differ by country.…”
This study explores the asymmetric effects of real effective exchange rate variation on domestic output in nine South East Asian nations. The study is the first thorough study on this issue for these countries. The results show that exchange rate fluctuations have asymmetric long‐run and short‐run effects on production in most nations. However, the findings vary across nations. Appreciation has a contractionary effect on production in most countries, while depreciation has an expansionary effect. In certain economies, an appreciation boosts domestic output whereas a depreciation diminishes it. Such conclusions can only be reached if appreciations and depreciations are separated, using non‐linear models.
“…For instance, according to Bahmani‐Oskooee, Halicioglu, and Mohammadian (2018), both PREX and NREX have expansionary impacts on domestic output. Iqbal et al (2022) provide substantial evidence demonstrating the asymmetric impacts of exchange rate variations on domestic output, both in the short and long terms, across all economies studied. According to Bahmani‐Oskooee and Arize (2020), results differ by country.…”
This study explores the asymmetric effects of real effective exchange rate variation on domestic output in nine South East Asian nations. The study is the first thorough study on this issue for these countries. The results show that exchange rate fluctuations have asymmetric long‐run and short‐run effects on production in most nations. However, the findings vary across nations. Appreciation has a contractionary effect on production in most countries, while depreciation has an expansionary effect. In certain economies, an appreciation boosts domestic output whereas a depreciation diminishes it. Such conclusions can only be reached if appreciations and depreciations are separated, using non‐linear models.
“…They further find that appreciation negates domestic production for some of the sample countries while a depreciation exerts no impact. Iqbal, et al (2022) using the nonlinear ARDL model and data from 1980 to 2019 for South Asian countries, explored the impact of exchange rate changes on domestic production. They decomposed the exchange rate into depreciation and appreciation to introduce nonlinearity into the adjustment process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the earlier studies used models that assumed the relationship between the real effective exchange rate and economic growth is linear. However, recent studies, including Iqbal, et al (2022), Bahmani-Oskooee and Arize (2020), and Eroğlu and Olayiwola (2023) have shown that the relationship between the real effective exchange rate and national output is better modeled in a nonlinear fashion. The present study contributes to the debate on the impact of the real effective exchange rate on economic growth by employing the nonlinear panel ARDL-PMG estimator proposed by Shin et al (2014).…”
This paper examines the effects of the real effective exchange rate on economic growth in 11 African countries from 1990 to 2022 using linear and nonlinear panel ARDL estimators. The linear panel ARDL-PMG results indicate that broad money supply and general government consumption positively impact economic growth in the short and long term, while the real effective exchange rate has an insignificant effect. The negative and statistically significant error correction term (ECTt-1) suggests a long-term relationship between the variables. Similarly, the nonlinear panel ARDL-PMG results show that broad money supply and general government consumption have positive and significant effects on economic growth in both the short and long term. Negative shocks in the real effective exchange rate hinder economic growth in the short and long term, while positive shocks do not significantly affect economic growth. The paper discusses the policy implications of these findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.