2020
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the association between worldwide implementation of the MPOWER package and smoking prevalence, 2008–2017

Abstract: BackgroundWe revisited the association between progress in MPOWER implementation from 2008 to 2016 and smoking prevalence from 2009 to 2017 and offered an in-depth understanding of differential outcomes for various country groups.MethodsWe used data from six rounds of the WHO Reports on the Global Tobacco Epidemic and calculated a composite MPOWER Score for each country in each period. We categorised the countries in four initial conditions based on their tobacco control preparedness measured by MPOWER score i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, we attempted to add the non-tax elements of the WHO's MPOWER package (i.e., MPOWE) into the analysis [26]. MPOWER comprises of best policy level practices aimed at lowering tobacco demand [27]. We believe that the lack of variation in the MPOWE scores was the main reason that we could not generate significant findings for these additional policy-level control variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we attempted to add the non-tax elements of the WHO's MPOWER package (i.e., MPOWE) into the analysis [26]. MPOWER comprises of best policy level practices aimed at lowering tobacco demand [27]. We believe that the lack of variation in the MPOWE scores was the main reason that we could not generate significant findings for these additional policy-level control variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study [11] estimated that in countries with higher initial tobacco control preparedness, as measured by an early MPOWER implementation, the prevalence of daily smoking decreased by between 0.39 and 0.50 percentage points for each increase in the MPOWER score, which indicates the strength of the adopted policies. By contrast, countries with initially low tobacco control preparedness and high daily smoking prevalence seem to be struggling to reduce prevalence despite progress in MPOWER implementation.…”
Section: Achievements Of Tobacco Control Efforts During the First 20 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Several longitudinal studies have found that countries with higher composite scores of MPOWER implementation tend to have lower smoking rates. 5 - 11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Several longitudinal studies have found that countries with higher composite scores of MPOWER implementation tend to have lower smoking rates. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] One policy recommendation of the FCTC and MPOWER is the use of pictorials on tobacco packaging that warn about the dangers of tobacco use. Specifically, in Article 11 of the FCTC, 12 and the corresponding "W" of MPOWER, 3 the WHO recommends that countries should place graphic pictorials on tobacco packages that depict certain diseases and other negative outcomes caused by tobacco use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%