2021
DOI: 10.1049/gtd2.12080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the active power direction method

Abstract: This paper presents a re‐examination of the active power direction method for locating the distortion sources in the power distribution network. The inaccuracies in the earlier analysis challenging the active power direction method are identified, and the claim of the inconsistency of the method is re‐examined. The article shows the derivation of the expression for the complex power, from which the equation for the active power flow through the point of measurement was derived in an explicit and in a normalise… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Problems with assessing the share contribution of distortion sources and with designing harmonic level reduction devices arise in the presence of external sources of distortion relative to the consumer's point of common coupling. There are known methods for estimating the contributions of distortion sources [19][20][21], but many of them are not applicable for determining the design parameters of harmonic-level reduction devices. For example, a method based on a Norton and Thevenin equivalent circuit with two consecutive measurements of harmonic currents and voltages at the PCC shows the grid and consumer contribution ratio of 55 to 45%, even when a shunt passive harmonic filter is used at a consumer bus with a nonlinear load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems with assessing the share contribution of distortion sources and with designing harmonic level reduction devices arise in the presence of external sources of distortion relative to the consumer's point of common coupling. There are known methods for estimating the contributions of distortion sources [19][20][21], but many of them are not applicable for determining the design parameters of harmonic-level reduction devices. For example, a method based on a Norton and Thevenin equivalent circuit with two consecutive measurements of harmonic currents and voltages at the PCC shows the grid and consumer contribution ratio of 55 to 45%, even when a shunt passive harmonic filter is used at a consumer bus with a nonlinear load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the customers cannot be held liable for PQ violations. Moreover, the faulty installation can also render useless the recently developed methods for determining the location of sources of harmonic distortion [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main problems in this case is to determine the degree of impact or the share contribution by a particular consumer at the grid connection point [10,11]. A large number of publications are devoted to this problem [12,13]. These tasks remain relevant over the past decades [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%