2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-005-9023-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting “Success”: Posttrial Analysis of a Gender-Specific HIV/STD Prevention Intervention

Abstract: Alongside the recognized need to foster the development of innovative gender-specific HIV interventions, researchers face the urgent need to further understand how current interventions do or do not work. Few studies build posttrial qualitative analysis into standardized interview assessments in randomized controlled trials in order to bolster an assessment of how interventions work. The current investigation is a posttrial qualitative analysis carried out on a randomly selected subsample (N=180), representing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(30 reference statements)
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same held true in a previous post-trial qualitative analysis from this trial (Dworkin, Exner, Melendez, Hoffman, & Ehrhardt, 2006). These results may be reflective of longstanding debates about placebo effects in control groups within clinical trials (Djulbegovic, 2001, Newman, Browner, Cummings, & Hulley 2001Parsons, 1974), and shed light on the specifics of how and why control groups change.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The same held true in a previous post-trial qualitative analysis from this trial (Dworkin, Exner, Melendez, Hoffman, & Ehrhardt, 2006). These results may be reflective of longstanding debates about placebo effects in control groups within clinical trials (Djulbegovic, 2001, Newman, Browner, Cummings, & Hulley 2001Parsons, 1974), and shed light on the specifics of how and why control groups change.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…To be asked about one's sexual behaviors in such a detailed and systematic format would have been a very unusual experience for these men (Gale 2004). The uniqueness of the interview experience, as well as the half-day of HIV education we provided in the control intervention, may have led control participants to become more attentive to the national HIV prevention campaign and may have stimulated them to reduce their risk behaviors (Dworkin et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing large body of research on gender scripting justifies this type of approach (e.g. Dworkin, Exner, Melendez, Hoffman, & Ehrhardt, 2006;Ortiz-Torres, Williams, & Ehrhardt, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%