2020
DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2020.1803473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting purchasing power parity in the ASEAN-5 countries: evidence from the Fourier quantile unit root test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Doğanlar, Mike and Kızılkaya (2021) also confirm the validity of the ppp hypothesis in 8 developed, 11 emerging, and 7 frontier market economies using the Fourier quantile unit root test. Bahramian and Saliminezhad (2021) conclude that the ppp hypothesis holds for four asean-5 countries. She et al (2021) test the ppp hypothesis using Fourier unit root tests for Pakistan against 21 trading partners and show that the ppp hypothesis mostly holds.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Doğanlar, Mike and Kızılkaya (2021) also confirm the validity of the ppp hypothesis in 8 developed, 11 emerging, and 7 frontier market economies using the Fourier quantile unit root test. Bahramian and Saliminezhad (2021) conclude that the ppp hypothesis holds for four asean-5 countries. She et al (2021) test the ppp hypothesis using Fourier unit root tests for Pakistan against 21 trading partners and show that the ppp hypothesis mostly holds.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This study used REER for the exchange rate as proxy to Malaysian real external competitiveness purchasing power, following the approach used by Bahramian and Saliminezhad (2020), Ibrahim (2000), and Wong (2017). Meanwhile, the FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index was used as the proxy for Malaysian stock market index.…”
Section: Data and Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies such as Taylor (1988), MacDonald (1993), Enders and Chumrusphonlert (2004), and Doğanlar et al (2009) can be given as examples of empirical studies that try to test the validity of PPP by examining the relationship between nominal exchange rates and price levels. Studies such as Papell (1997), Baum et al (1999), Narayan (2005), Kalyoncu and Kalyoncu (2008), Acaravci and Ozturk (2010), Chang et al (2012), Pan et al (2012), He and Chang (2013), Bahmani-Oskooee et al (2014), Karagöz and Saraç (2016), Bahmani-Oskooee et al (2018), Mike and Kızılkaya (2019), Bahramian and Saliminezhad (2020) and Doğanlar et al (2020) can be given as examples of empirical studies trying to reveal the validity of PPP by testing the stationarity of the real exchange rate. In this study, to test the validity of absolute PPP, it is investigated whether the real exchange rate is stationary or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%