Revisiting publish or perish

Bond, Christine

doi:10.1093/ijpp/riad002

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The culture of research has been in focus for the recent years as it is undergoing substantial change and influences all processes in science and all stakeholders (individual researchers, research teams and laboratories, universities, journals, associations of researchers, ministries, and other related institutions). Open science, e-science, a wide spread of scientometrics and other quantitative tools of assessment, a worldwide "publish or perish" research policy (Jones, 1999;Bond, 2023), and global change of the academic profession (Lenzen, 2015) might have added to the significance of the theme (Munafò et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Culture of Research: A Systematic Scoping Review

Tikhonova,

Raitskaya

2024

JLE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Research culture is the core of many processes in science. It is a broad concept presumably entailing practices, traditions, norms, etc. that prevail among researchers and other stakeholders in the field. Its definition, architecture, and taxonomy are essential in generating and pursuing scientific policies at universities and countries. As there is a lack of comprehensive reviews on research culture, the present publication aspires to fill the existing gap in the knowledge. This review aims to define research culture and build an architecture of research culture based on the relevant literature indexed in the Scopus database. Method: The problem, concept, and context (PCC) framework was applied to establish an effective search strategy and word the research questions corresponding to the aim. Based on Arksey and O'Malley's methodology (2005) and PRISMA checklist (2020) for systematic reviews, the authors sorted out 56 relevant publications for systematic scoping review. In addition, a bibliometric analysis was applied to examine the field. Results: Using a bibliometric analysis, the 56 publications were distributed by year, country, most prolific authors, sources, research fields, affiliation, and type of publication. With the help of VOSviewer, the authors singled out four thematic clusters (research culture; medical and biomedical research, methodology and research ethics, and clinical studies and human experiments). After synthesizing the data extracted from the documents under review, research culture was defined; components of research culture were singled out and summed up; and a framework of research culture was made up. The authors analysed the review findings in contrast with other research, offering their own comprehensive definition of research culture, its taxonomy, and an architecture of research culture. Conclusion: The current review adds to the understanding of research culture, its gist, component classification. The limitation related to the period of review (2019-2024) may be overcome by further reviews of relevant publications from a historic perspective that would broaden perceptions of the origin of modern research culture and its negative aspects.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Culture of Research: A Systematic Scoping Review

Tikhonova,

Raitskaya

2024

JLE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Recent breakthroughs in genetic and brain structural correlates of suicidal behaviours: A short review

Ceja,

Van Velzen,

Campos

et al. 2024

Biological Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Global dioxin research trends and focal points: A century-long visual and bibliometric analysis (1923–2022)

Zyoud

2024

Toxicol Ind Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dioxin-like compounds, recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) as among the most enduring toxic chemical substances in the environment, are linked to various occupational activities and industrial accidents worldwide. The aim of this study was to examine and present research publications on dioxins, pinpoint current research trends, identify research gaps, and highlight potential avenues for future exploration in the field. The study period for relevant research articles ranged from 1923 to December 31, 2022, and these articles were sourced from the Scopus database. The analysis involved the identification of key contributors to the field and the visualization of topics, themes, and international collaboration. VOSviewer software (version 1.6.20) was used for visualization analysis. A total of 11,620 publications on dioxins were documented in the Scopus database. The predominant category of these documents comprised 9780 original articles, which represents 84.17% of the total publications. The United States lead in the number of publications, with 3992 (34.35%), followed by Japan, with 1429 (12.3%), China, with 1005 (8.65%), and Germany, with 974 (8.38%). Before 2002, scholarly attention in this field focused primarily on the health effects, environmental fate, and mechanism of toxicity of tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). However, a noticeable change in research focus has been observed since 2002, highlighting the emergence of a topic related to the health effects and environmental fate of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PFDFs). This study is the first to conduct a comprehensive quantitative bibliometric analysis of dioxins over time. These findings indicate a significant increase in the overall growth of the dioxin literature over the past 30 years. These findings may prove crucial in guiding and organizing subsequent investigations related to dioxins.

show abstract

Revisiting publish or perish

Cited by 3 publications

References 10 publications

The Culture of Research: A Systematic Scoping Review

The Culture of Research: A Systematic Scoping Review

Recent breakthroughs in genetic and brain structural correlates of suicidal behaviours: A short review

Global dioxin research trends and focal points: A century-long visual and bibliometric analysis (1923–2022)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About