Background and Aim: In gynodioecious plants, male-sterile individuals must have a female advantage to coexist with bisexual individuals. In European chestnuts, characterized by a form of late-acting self-incompatibility, male-fertile trees produce large amounts of pollen when female flowers are receptive, resulting in abundant self-pollination. Here we study whether male-sterile chestnut trees have an increased fruit set compared to male-fertile trees because they escape from the negative consequences of self-pollination on ovules, a case of self-interference.
Methods: We measured fruit set of 242 male-fertile and male-sterile trees during three consecutive years. To test experimentally the hypothesis of negative interference of self-pollen on ovules as the origin of the female advantage of male-sterile trees, we emasculated male-fertile trees and compared their fruit set with that of control male-fertile trees. We performed the same experiment on male-sterile trees by removing the sterile but rewarding male catkins as a natural control to test for the effect of decreased insect attractiveness on fruit set.
Key Results: The fruit set of male-sterile trees is higher than that of male-fertile trees by a factor of two in some years. Following emasculation, male-fertile trees have a higher fruit set than control male-fertile trees, pointing to a negative effect of the massive amount of self-pollen produced by fertile male catkins on fertilization probability of female flowers. In contrast, emasculated male-sterile trees had a lower fruit set than control male-sterile trees, pointing to a decrease in insect attractiveness after removing nectar-producing male catkins.
Conclusions: Our emasculation experiment showed that sexual interference results in massive ovule discounting in male-fertile trees, sufficient for accounting for the persistence of female trees in natural populations of European chestnut trees.