2010
DOI: 10.3183/npprj-2010-25-01-p071-075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting polarized light microscopy for fiber-fiber bond area measurement - Part II: Proving the applicability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To explain the spread of data, we have to consider the large variation in fibre-fibre bonded area. Kappel et al44 measured bonded areas by microtomy and optical microscopy that range from 500 to 3000  μm 2 . Comparison of the optically determined bonded area with the AFM image reconstruction demonstrated a 10% larger bonded area for the optical determination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explain the spread of data, we have to consider the large variation in fibre-fibre bonded area. Kappel et al44 measured bonded areas by microtomy and optical microscopy that range from 500 to 3000  μm 2 . Comparison of the optically determined bonded area with the AFM image reconstruction demonstrated a 10% larger bonded area for the optical determination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the PLM method used in the present study is given in Kappel et al (2010). In the currently presented results, the measurements of OBA were performed without dying the lower fibre.…”
Section: Optically Bonded Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods 17,19,27,32−34 have been described in the literature to analyze the bonded area of the fiber−fiber interface, and they can be classified as either indirect methods (for example, by determining the relative bonding area), 20,32,35 or direct methods (for example, by microscope observation). 33,36,37 For indirect methods, the relative bonding area (RBA) concept was proposed 20,32,35 and was measured by employing the BET nitrogen absorption technique or light scattering coefficient. 19,32 However, the indirect methods involve complex processes, plentiful parameter conversions, and increasing errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods ,,,− have been described in the literature to analyze the bonded area of the fiber–fiber interface, and they can be classified as either indirect methods (for example, by determining the relative bonding area), ,, or direct methods (for example, by microscope observation). ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%