2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Pesticide Taxation Schemes

Abstract: This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The narrow range of options, particularly in organic production, requires that insecticide treatments are carefully optimized in order to prolong their effectiveness and counter the development of resistance [29,30]. Frequent, prophylactic, and sometimes superfluous insecticide applications add to the growers’ private costs and also have negative external effects due to detrimental impacts on the environment and human health [31]. Furthermore, consumer trust may be undermined in a time of growing awareness for health and environmental issues in the food chain [32,33].…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The narrow range of options, particularly in organic production, requires that insecticide treatments are carefully optimized in order to prolong their effectiveness and counter the development of resistance [29,30]. Frequent, prophylactic, and sometimes superfluous insecticide applications add to the growers’ private costs and also have negative external effects due to detrimental impacts on the environment and human health [31]. Furthermore, consumer trust may be undermined in a time of growing awareness for health and environmental issues in the food chain [32,33].…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequent, prophylactic, and sometimes superfluous insecticide applications add to the growers’ private costs and also have negative external effects due to detrimental impacts on the environment and human health [31]. Furthermore, consumer trust may be undermined in a time of growing awareness for health and environmental issues in the food chain [32,33]. …”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review provides some evidence that risk-based taxation-which links taxation more closely to external effects-can be effective in reducing the environmental and health effects from pesticides. In contrast, non-differentiated taxation, e.g., ad-valorem or per unit taxes, of pesticides can have unintended consequences as quantity reductions can be achieved through substitution with more toxic products [66]. Closer proportionality of taxes in relation to environmental and health risks may also increase the likelihood that a tax will be perceived as fair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In France, the intent of the Plan Écophyto 2018, when introduced in 2008, was to reduce crop protection product use (arbitrarily) by half by 2018, remove the ‘most dangerous’ products from the market, foster and support integrated programs through training and subsidies, and monitor offenders vigorously . Another approach favored by some countries has been the imposition of higher taxes for crop protection products with less favorable toxicological or environmental properties, with the intention of driving down their use . This latter approach has captured the interest of the EU, who wants to harmonize it across countries .…”
Section: Other Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Another approach favored by some countries has been the imposition of higher taxes for crop protection products with less favorable toxicological or environmental properties, with the intention of driving down their use. 24 This latter approach has captured the interest of the EU, who wants to harmonize it across countries. 25 Additional directives are aimed at the desire for water free of a.i.s or their metabolites, and together with the previous goals, the end result is a situation in which the reduction of available effective crop protection products will continue and eventually leading to an accompanying increase in resistance.…”
Section: Other Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%