2015
DOI: 10.1111/add.13146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting our review of Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): meta‐analytical results still point to no efficacy in increasing the use of substance use disorder services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Importantly, brief alcohol use screening tools have high validity for identifying the risk of alcohol use among youth with chronic conditions. 5 Screening, coupled with brief interventions, has revealed promise for reducing alcohol use among adults 18,19 and may be a highly efficient and impactful intervention strategy for youth in care for a chronic illness. These youth have strong ties to their medical providers, 20 regular health care encounters, 21 and a strong motivation to protect their health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Importantly, brief alcohol use screening tools have high validity for identifying the risk of alcohol use among youth with chronic conditions. 5 Screening, coupled with brief interventions, has revealed promise for reducing alcohol use among adults 18,19 and may be a highly efficient and impactful intervention strategy for youth in care for a chronic illness. These youth have strong ties to their medical providers, 20 regular health care encounters, 21 and a strong motivation to protect their health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the identified studies did not provide sufficient data to examine an association between post-SBI treatment utilization and clinical outcomes. In a subsequent editorial the authors re-analyzed these studies along with additional trial data and found the same results [67]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As with HIV and other conditions, issues of linking people from testing or screening steps to those of evaluation and treatment arise for substance misuse and SUDs (39, 45, 46). SBIRT and related interventions are important efforts to improve and expand screening and link identified people to care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant experience in HIV, HCV, and TB care suggests that processes of passive referral to treatment after screening yield inferior linkage outcomes compared to systems of active linkage (18, 47, 48). This issue may be particularly relevant to the evaluation of SBIRT implementation efforts, as studies have identified gaps in engagement in treatment post-referral, and the proportion successfully linked to further evaluation and treatment could be well monitored through appropriately developed substance-related continuum analyses (39, 45, 46). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%