2017
DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2017.00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Medicalization: A Critique of the Assumptions of What Counts As Medical Knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
36
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…A full rehearsal of these debates (Busfield ,b, Williams et al . ), including the not insignificant matter of what counts as medicalisation in the first place, if not medicalisation s in the plural (Correia ) is beyond the scope of this paper. Suffice it to say, for present purposes, that the position we are taking here follows others who argue that each of these concepts may vary independently of one another in complex, dynamic ways (see Abraham , Bell and Figert , Williams et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A full rehearsal of these debates (Busfield ,b, Williams et al . ), including the not insignificant matter of what counts as medicalisation in the first place, if not medicalisation s in the plural (Correia ) is beyond the scope of this paper. Suffice it to say, for present purposes, that the position we are taking here follows others who argue that each of these concepts may vary independently of one another in complex, dynamic ways (see Abraham , Bell and Figert , Williams et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“… See for example Hislop and Arber (), Williams (), Cheung et al . () for previous discussion of these concepts and relations, and Correia () for a recent rethink of medicalisations in the plural. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Correira () has wondered if these changes have radically changed the fundamental theoretical prerogatives of the concept of medicalisation (expansion of medical jurisdiction, medical dominance, and medical control of deviant behaviour). In the debate, there are also critical voices about the prevalent negative connotation attributed to the concept of medicalisation.…”
Section: Medicalisation: Genesis and Development Of A Medical Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, it is not possible to deepen this debate. For a theoretical–epistemological reflection on the medicalisation process, see Rafalovich () and Correia ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uses of language of risk in medicine "scientific discursivity" is used to justify the idea that the hospital is the safe place to delivery any birth. According to Foucault (1988), discursive fields are always linked to institutions and power strategies that reproduce social order and mechanisms to control population and bodies (Dictionary of social sciences, 2002; Correia, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%