Revisiting Mediation in the Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

The process of mediation is of critical importance to the social and behavioral sciences and to evolutionary social psychology in particular. As with the concept of evolutionary adaptation, however, one can argue that causal mediation is in need of explicit theoretical justification and empirical support. Mainstream evolutionary social psychology proposes, for example, that organisms are "adaptation executers", and not "fitness maximizers". The execution of adaptations is triggered by fitness-relevant ecological contingencies at both ultimate and proximate levels of analysis. This logic is essentially equivalent to what methodologists refer to as the process of mediation; the adaptations to be executed (or not, depending upon the prevailing environmental circumstances) causally mediate the effects of the ecological contingencies upon the fitness outcomes. Thus, the process of mediation can be generally conceptualized as a causal chain of events leading to a given outcome or set of outcomes. If a predictor variable operates through an intervening variable to affect a criterion variable, then mediation is said to exist. Nevertheless, it does not appear that some psychologists (particularly evolutionary-social psychologists) are sufficiently well-versed in the fundamental logic and quantitative methodology of establishing causal mediation to support such claims. In the current paper, we set out to review the ways researchers support their use of mediation statements and also propose critical considerations on this front. We start with more conventional methods for testing mediation, discuss variants of the conventional approach, discuss the limitations of such methods as we see them, and end with our preferred mediation approach.

<p>Big Five Personality Traits and Gratitude: The Role of Emotional Intelligence</p>

“…47 Therefore, we assumed that emotional intelligence could be a potential mediator between dimensions of personality according to the Big Five Model, and gratitude (Hypothesis 3). Although there are well-established dilemmas with the implementation of cross-sectional mediation analyses to gather evidence for causal processes, 48,49 mediation models are useful with strong prior theoretical justification and empirical support 50 for the relationships between the independent variables, dependent variable, and mediator. In the following section, we have attempted to provide the main rationale that regards the crucial assumption of the temporal precedence in the mediational scheme.…”

The cognitive ecology of Mexico: Climatic and socio-cultural effects on life history strategies and cognitive abilities

“…Thus, those with higher intelligence will produce children with similar cognitive advantages in environments with greater access to opportunities to maintain and transmit their high quality of life intergenerationally. By this reasoning, differential-K and social privilege theories may be operating at different hierarchical levels of organization, with the prior level influencing the next level (see Figueredo, Garcia, Cabeza de Baca, Gable, & Weise, 2013, for a conceptual and statistical explanation of cascade modeling). Among birds, for example, altitude greatly influenced parental strategies.…”

A Moderated Mediation Model for Board Diversity and Corporate Performance in ASEAN Countries

“…According to [78], 3-step approach in which several regression analyses is performed to establish that zero-order relationships among the variables exist with the purpose of predicting any significant or non-significant relationships to conclude possibility of mediation existence [79,80]. The interpretation of [78] causal steps approach tests for the relative size of the indirect effect compared to the direct effect, in which full mediation results when c' is non-significant, partial mediation eventuates while c is sum of c' and indirect effect (a*b), and no mediation happens only if c and c' have zero amount.…”