2019
DOI: 10.1002/hbe2.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting media richness theory for today and future

Abstract: Media richness theory was developed in the mid‐1980s in the field of business management and became very popular along with the diffusion of electronic communication media. Despite the popularity, inconsistent results from empirical studies have been the issues with this theory. In addition, the recent advanced communication technology has been raising more challenges towards the original concepts. Thus, we have reviewed the literature in the past decade to illustrate diverse applications and validity of the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
76
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Media richness theory was introduced in 1986 (Daft & Lengel, 1986); it is a framework used to rank and evaluate the richness of certain communication media, including email. It is useful to distinguish, like Ishii, Lyons, and Carr (2019), between earlier versions of media richness theory (e.g. Daft, Lengel, & Trevino, 1987), which were objectivist and understood media such as email as inherently "lean" as opposed to the richness of face-to-face communication, and later forms of media richness theory which also incorporated subjective experience and social influence such as organizational culture in interpreting a medium's potential (Carlson & Zmud, 1999).…”
Section: Media Richness Theory and Emailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Media richness theory was introduced in 1986 (Daft & Lengel, 1986); it is a framework used to rank and evaluate the richness of certain communication media, including email. It is useful to distinguish, like Ishii, Lyons, and Carr (2019), between earlier versions of media richness theory (e.g. Daft, Lengel, & Trevino, 1987), which were objectivist and understood media such as email as inherently "lean" as opposed to the richness of face-to-face communication, and later forms of media richness theory which also incorporated subjective experience and social influence such as organizational culture in interpreting a medium's potential (Carlson & Zmud, 1999).…”
Section: Media Richness Theory and Emailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefits of video counselling compared to other behavioural interventions such as telephone counselling and written materials include that video counselling allows counsellors to respond to the client’s verbal and non-verbal cues. The Media Richness theory ( Ishii et al, 2019 ) conceptualises that real-time video counselling would rank highly as a rich mode of communication because it provides virtual face-to-face support. The advisors are able to respond to non-verbal cues which may increase therapeutic alliance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Media richness is defined as "the ability of information to change understanding within a time interval" (Daft & Lengel, 1986, p. 560) and depends on the availability of immediate feedback (i.e., possibility to ask questions and to make corrections), multiple cues (i.e., number of social cues available), language variety (i.e., the range of meaning that can be conveyed), and personal focus (i.e., personal feelings and emotions can be expressed, Daft et al, 1987). According to Media Richness Theory, despite giant leaps in the development of video conferencing technologies, video conferencing is still behind on face-to-face interactions in terms of media richness (Dennis & Kinney, 1998;Ishii et al, 2019). For example, in video conferencing, verbal communication may be hindered by time lags and other connection failures leading to less fluent communication exchanges, which may prevent fluent turn taking between communicating parties (Powers et al, 2011;Wegge, 2006).…”
Section: Media Richness Theory and Chances For (Non)verbal Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%