2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land-use change models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
179
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
179
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to check the quantification of map similarities and dissimilarities, the Map Comparison Kit (MCK) was used in this study [29]. The MCK is software used for map comparison.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to check the quantification of map similarities and dissimilarities, the Map Comparison Kit (MCK) was used in this study [29]. The MCK is software used for map comparison.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to ensure that the Markov model and CA model were valid for simulation, Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated [29]. Cohen's kappa measures the agreement between two raters.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To statistically quantify these errors, a random selection of pixels of the classified maps was performed to build a confusion matrix. The kappa coefficient K, a discrete multivariate technique used in accuracy assessments of thematic maps, is an efficient approach to derive information from an image via the confusion matrix [22][23][24][25]. K > 0.80 represents strong agreement and good accuracy, 0.40-0.80 is middle, and <0.40 is poor [26].…”
Section: Land Use Land Cover Change Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was progressively noted that a full characterization of a fit between two maps should tackle not only quantity or location of changes of matching cells but also distances between locations of matching cells [44]. To address this and a number of other map comparison bottlenecks [46,47], alternative algorithms have been proposed over the years [48][49][50]. Pontius and Millones [51] suggested that summarizing cross-tabulation matrix of the simulated and the observed land-use map in terms of quantity and spatial allocation disagreements will sufficiently account for differences between two categorical maps in terms of the quantity (changes or persistence) and allocation of matching cells.…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%