2017
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2017.722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting ignited–quenched transition and the non-Newtonian rheology of a sheared dilute gas–solid suspension

Abstract: The hydrodynamics and rheology of a sheared dilute gas-solid suspension, consisting of inelastic hard-spheres suspended in a gas, are analysed using anisotropic Maxwellian as the single particle distribution function. The closed-form solutions for granular temperature (T ) and three invariants of the second-moment tensor are obtained as functions of the Stokes number (St), the mean density (ν) and the restitution coefficient (e). Multiple states of high and low temperatures are found when the Stokes number is … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As said in the Introduction, this state is macroscopically defined by a constant density n, a spatially uniform temperature T (t), and a flow velocity U i = a ij r j , where a ij = aδ ix δ jy , a being the constant shear rate. In addition, as usual in uniform sheared suspensions [17][18][19]39], the average velocity of particles follows the velocity of the fluid phase and so, U = U g . One of the main advantages of the USF at a microscopic level is that in this state all the space dependence of the one-particle velocity distribution function f (r, v, t) occurs through its dependence on the peculiar velocity V = v − U(r) [40].…”
Section: B Steady Uniform Shear Flowmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As said in the Introduction, this state is macroscopically defined by a constant density n, a spatially uniform temperature T (t), and a flow velocity U i = a ij r j , where a ij = aδ ix δ jy , a being the constant shear rate. In addition, as usual in uniform sheared suspensions [17][18][19]39], the average velocity of particles follows the velocity of the fluid phase and so, U = U g . One of the main advantages of the USF at a microscopic level is that in this state all the space dependence of the one-particle velocity distribution function f (r, v, t) occurs through its dependence on the peculiar velocity V = v − U(r) [40].…”
Section: B Steady Uniform Shear Flowmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, it has also been confirmed [39] that the present Padé-approximants provide a useful guide (or, benchmark) to decide the "order" of series solutions that must be retained to obtain accurate solutions for the related granular Poiseuille flow -these results will be discussed in a future publication. Another interesting future work would be to determine the solutions of 13-moment extended hydrodynamic equations [40][41][42] with appropriate boundary conditions for Poiseuille flow and compare them with the present Padé-approximants in the bulk region of the channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this, a normal damping force acts over the duration of each collision and is given by (Rapaport 2004), where is the normal component of the relative velocity of two colliding particles, denotes the mass of a particle and is the damping coefficient. This particle-level damping is akin to (i) a ‘velocity-dependent’ normal restitution coefficient in a granular gas (Goldhirsch 2003; Brilliantov & Pöschel 2004) and/or (ii) a drag force in a gas–solid suspension (Jackson 2000; Saha & Alam 2017) at large Stokes numbers; the specific role of this damping mechanism on both primary and secondary bifurcations and the emerging patterns are discussed in appendix A.
Figure 1. Schematic and the domain binning of the TC cell; is the height of the cylinders, and are the inner and outer radii, and is the gap width; the rotational speeds of the inner and outer cylinders are and , respectively.
…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Of Taylor–couette Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%