2023
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.107.023003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting GeV-scale annihilating dark matter with the AMS-02 positron fraction

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high uncertainties in our estimations of the local positron flux have direct implications in the current searches for dark matter and also in the evaluation of the production of positrons (and electrons) by nearby sources, namely SNRs and PWNs. For what concerns DM searches, there have been a few recent studies using positrons to constrain the annihilation rate of leptophilic dark matter [94,127,128]. Our results indicate that the searches for DM features in the positron spectrum will be highly affected by the astrophysical uncertainties, specially when the signals expected are not sharp, as it is the case of the expected signal from a heavy mass WIMP or the signal generated in the τ τ channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high uncertainties in our estimations of the local positron flux have direct implications in the current searches for dark matter and also in the evaluation of the production of positrons (and electrons) by nearby sources, namely SNRs and PWNs. For what concerns DM searches, there have been a few recent studies using positrons to constrain the annihilation rate of leptophilic dark matter [94,127,128]. Our results indicate that the searches for DM features in the positron spectrum will be highly affected by the astrophysical uncertainties, specially when the signals expected are not sharp, as it is the case of the expected signal from a heavy mass WIMP or the signal generated in the τ τ channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In fact, using synthetic data to test the ability of their analysis to spot this kind of features, the authors of ref. [127] pointed out that they were unable to identify masses larger than ∼ 30 GeV in the µµ channel and totally unable to correctly identify any signal generated in the τ τ channel, even though they did not consider reacceleration in their approach, which may significantly affect their results. On top of this, we note that even sharp DM signals may be masked by the emission of more conventional sources of positrons, as PWNs or even SNRs (see ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider this an alternative explanation to be probed by multiwavelength observations. In a separate paper (Krommydas & Cholis 2023), we explore the possible impact these lower-energy features have on dark matter limits. We make publicly available our burst simulations in Cholis & Krommydas (2022a), while our background simulations are available through Cholis & Krommydas (2021, 2022b.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%