Geographies of Mobility 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315266336-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Gender, Race, and Commuting in New York

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this hypothesis, housing market discrimination and limited access to private vehicles hampered the opportunities of African-Americans in inner areas of US cities to access suburbanising employment ( Kain, 1968 ). Research has diversified in many ways since, including but not limited to: scholarship on spatial containment and entrapment of women of different racial/ethnic backgrounds ( Hanson and Pratt, 1995 ; Preston and McLafferty, 2016 ); studies of the uneven distribution of the benefits and costs of transport subsidies, policies and infrastructure development ( Hodge, 1988 ; Hay, 1993 ; Murray and Davis, 2001 ; Foth et al, 2013 ; Pereira et al, 2019 ); and work on how transport disadvantage and social exclusion interact with each other ( Lucas, 2012 ; Lucas et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: A Surge Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this hypothesis, housing market discrimination and limited access to private vehicles hampered the opportunities of African-Americans in inner areas of US cities to access suburbanising employment ( Kain, 1968 ). Research has diversified in many ways since, including but not limited to: scholarship on spatial containment and entrapment of women of different racial/ethnic backgrounds ( Hanson and Pratt, 1995 ; Preston and McLafferty, 2016 ); studies of the uneven distribution of the benefits and costs of transport subsidies, policies and infrastructure development ( Hodge, 1988 ; Hay, 1993 ; Murray and Davis, 2001 ; Foth et al, 2013 ; Pereira et al, 2019 ); and work on how transport disadvantage and social exclusion interact with each other ( Lucas, 2012 ; Lucas et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: A Surge Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lack of accessible transportation is often cited as a barrier to employment for people with disabilities ( Bezyak et al, 2019 ; Lubin and Feeley, 2016 ), but much less is known about the travel patterns of disabled individuals when they are employed and how their commutes relate to the localities where they live and work. In the general population, there is strong evidence to demonstrate that transportation and commuting patterns greatly influence people's job access and wage earnings ( Preston and McLafferty, 2016 ; Kim et al, 2012 ), but these studies do not address disability. The few studies that investigate the commute patterns of people with disabilities include Deka and Lubin (2012) and Brucker and Rollins (2019) , who found commute times to be similar between workers with and without disabilities in New Jersey and across the U.S., respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographic contexts, especially residential contexts, differ in the numbers, types, and locations of job opportunities; the availability of social and employment services; and transportation access and cost – all of which shape workers' commuting decisions and wage earnings. Research on the entire working population shows disparities in commute time, distance, and mode across residential contexts ( Preston and McLafferty, 2016 ; Hu, 2015 ; Lee et al, 2018 ; Sultana and Weber, 2014 ), and it is likely that similar disparities exist for disabled workers. More empirical work on the spatial heterogeneity of wage earnings and commute patterns would enhance our current understandings of how geographic conditions influence the socioeconomic inequities experienced by workers with disabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations