2021
DOI: 10.1038/s42255-021-00451-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting energy expenditure: how to correct mouse metabolic rate for body mass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
51
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Body mass was included and kept as covariate in all tested models. Changes in metabolic rate were analyzed with m b as a covariate because this approach allows discriminating between mass-dependent and mass-independent differences in metabolic rate between groups (Packard and Boardman 1988 ; Tschöp et al 2012 ; Fernández-Verdejo et al 2019 ; Müller et al 2021 ). Type of cage and nesting material were retained as fixed factors in final model of the first analysis, and the effect of housing in pairs was retained in final model of the second analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body mass was included and kept as covariate in all tested models. Changes in metabolic rate were analyzed with m b as a covariate because this approach allows discriminating between mass-dependent and mass-independent differences in metabolic rate between groups (Packard and Boardman 1988 ; Tschöp et al 2012 ; Fernández-Verdejo et al 2019 ; Müller et al 2021 ). Type of cage and nesting material were retained as fixed factors in final model of the first analysis, and the effect of housing in pairs was retained in final model of the second analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1h for graphical illustration). Moreover, because the deviation of each data point from the regression line is preserved under ANCOVA 38 , it enables visualization of group differences at a given body weight. The results showed that the predicted EE based on a fixed body weight, arbitrarily set at 30 g, was reduced in old mice in response to both HIIT and MICT (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the latter indicated significant difference, individual group differences were computed using Bonferroni test. For energy expenditure, ANCOVA analysis was performed with body weight as a covariate [ 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%