2011
DOI: 10.1056/nejmp1102099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting E&M Visit Guidelines — A Missing Piece of Payment Reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are five levels of payment, which are determined by a tabular interplay of four levels of medical history, four levels of physical examination, and four levels of medical decision making [12]. This results in abundantly detailed documentation, which is necessary for billing purposes, and, with the exception of medical decision making, is often clinically irrelevant [13]. The EHR compounds this problem by facilitating the collection of many redundant or irrelevant details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are five levels of payment, which are determined by a tabular interplay of four levels of medical history, four levels of physical examination, and four levels of medical decision making [12]. This results in abundantly detailed documentation, which is necessary for billing purposes, and, with the exception of medical decision making, is often clinically irrelevant [13]. The EHR compounds this problem by facilitating the collection of many redundant or irrelevant details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of an existing flawed system. The E&M system is felt to be a generally flawed way to capture visit complexity (Berenson, Basch, and Sussex, 2011;Berenson and Goodson, 2016;Brett 1998). As one critic argued,…”
Section: Existing Eandm Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to numerous problems, including overdocumentation, upcoding, and undercoding (Berenson, Basch, and Sussex, 2011).…”
Section: Existing Eandm Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, physician notes are bloated with excess documentation to satisfy complicated billing guidelines so that current documentation guidelines may hinder effective communication. 6 There have been concerns that the efficiency and quality benefits of electronic health records have been Including physicians in the DRG payment could lead to better physician engagement in quality improvement efforts and, therefore, improved success of those efforts.…”
Section: Potential Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%