Revisiting Development in the Twenty-First Century

Sachs, Ignacy

doi:10.2753/ijp0891-1916380301

Cited by 15 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Using an approach based on a renewed agrarian political economy, which is part of a geographical political ecology of food systems, this chapter draws attention to new strands of research in the region that are once again pushing theories in new directions. (Scoones, 2009) or ideology (Sachs, 2009) whose effects tie together economic, social and environmental improvements to all categories of people in rural areas. In contrast, endogenous rural development draws from cohesive community structures and represents both the source of social and individual identity and social obligations within and toward communities.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction

Kovács

2021

Politics and the Environment in Eastern Europe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt the text and to make commercial use of the text providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information:

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction

Kovács

2021

Politics and the Environment in Eastern Europe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…I centre this discussion around extended ethnographic research in three villages in Vojvodina Province in Serbia, where I studied understandings and practical effects of state-led and endogenous rural development. Intellectual conceptualisations of rural development and its realisation by state and policy makers have ceased to mean only the improvement of economic and social standing of land users (or targeted groups or individuals), but also imply rather complex planning, goals (Scoones, 2009) or ideology (Sachs, 2009) whose effects tie together economic, social and environmental improvements to all categories of people in rural areas. In contrast, endogenous rural development draws from cohesive community structures and represents both the source of social and individual identity and social obligations within and toward communities.…”

Section: Jovana Dikovicmentioning

confidence: 99%

Politics and the environment in Eastern Europe

Soaita

2023

Eurasian Geography and Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This book became possible because of the generous support of the Leverhulme Trust through an Early Career Research Fellowship, which during my time at the Department of Geography at the University of Cambridge was also financed by the Newton Trust. The time and independence of thought won for research through such grants is incalculable. Workshops and conferences were also enabled through a British Academy Small Grant.I would like to thank Eszter Kelemen, György Pataki, Jessica Hope, Tatiana Thieme and Bill Adams for their comments and conversations on earlier drafts and iterations of some of the arguments presented here.I will also never forget how the final versions of these chapters took shape, as bubbles of time unpredictably won during little Sophie's naps. I am very thankful for the understanding, patience and kindness shown by all the contributors and supporters to this volume during this time.xi Contributors has a particular interest in farming and food systems and agricultural policy's effects on biodiversity, water and farmers' livelihoods.

show abstract

“…Next, the 1980s to the mid-1990s was named the market-centred urban development period. Last, the period of Mubarak time that continued since 2011 was named the governance period [19]. An overview of how the development paradigms have evolved is followed by the analysis of actual urban development projects, which encompasses expropriation from 1950 onward, focusing on the era of socialism, the life and death of the neoliberal, and the global emerge.…”

Section: Expropriation and State Transformationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Expropriation between a legal figure and an approach for urban development: global trends and Egyptian reflections

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Expropriation of land is considered a crucial instrument of any development practice. The legitimacy of expropriation is essentially reinforced as it is employed for the public interest, often implied as infrastructure and public services. While in the private property on one side and the public interest on the other, urban development acts to be the art of getting the right balance. Despite urban development paradigms significantly affecting expropriation practices, most reviewed literature focused on legal aspects of expropriation. However, few were attentive to addressing the relation between expropriation and the urban universe. What are the current trends of the expropriation function and how extensively is it used for urban development? It can be elaborated as the study’s core question, while the research aims at mapping the development of the expropriation function and how extensively expropriation is used across time and space. Therefore, the study adopts a qualitative comparative approach to explore the global trends of expropriation for urban development and map convergence and deviations. The proposed criteria for comparison aim to discover how extensively expropriation is used, the legal changes and the institutional contexts. In addition, the applied part of the study uses a case study analysis method. A chronological timeline analysis of the Egyptian case was conducted to explore the nature of expropriation practices of Nasser’s time (1956–1970) to Mubarak’s time (1981–2011) in Egypt.Globally, expropriation practices have a heterogeneous nature. Certain features, however, are common enough to justify classifying practices for this study. The research comes up with a schematic mapping intending not to be comprehensive but flexible enough to be applied as a framework to analyse and compare other cases in different contexts. Finally, the research concludes by comparing and positioning the Egyptian case in the light of the global trends and provides principal lessons to planners, governmental parties, and policy-makers.

show abstract

Revisiting Development in the Twenty-First Century

Cited by 15 publications

References 5 publications

Introduction

Introduction

Politics and the environment in Eastern Europe

Expropriation between a legal figure and an approach for urban development: global trends and Egyptian reflections

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About