2012
DOI: 10.1177/1555343412448385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Decision Support Systems for Cognitive Readiness

Abstract: In this article, the authors focus on scheduling situations. Because of their unstructured nature and hard combinatorial complexity, scheduling situations have always been a predominant application area for decision support systems (DSSes). After setting out the generic characteristics of a DSS, the authors summarize some of their known limitations in scheduling situations. They argue that scheduling situations focus excessively on performance and effectiveness and neglect the potential of human schedulers. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If drivers' perceived level of complexity is reduced, they are likely to be more willing to engage in automated driving. Since better-trained drivers are more capable of dealing with more complex situations [44], driver training is one way to reduce perceived situation complexity by developing automatic information processing [45], resulting in driving situations being seen as more transparent and predictable. Therefore, improving drivers' cognitive and perceptual skills will help increase engagement with vehicle automation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If drivers' perceived level of complexity is reduced, they are likely to be more willing to engage in automated driving. Since better-trained drivers are more capable of dealing with more complex situations [44], driver training is one way to reduce perceived situation complexity by developing automatic information processing [45], resulting in driving situations being seen as more transparent and predictable. Therefore, improving drivers' cognitive and perceptual skills will help increase engagement with vehicle automation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such algorithms are usually based on a one-o analysis of the scheduling problem, impeding the adaptability and exibility needed for sustained user acceptance. Cegarra and Van Wezel (2012) argued that support should link to schedulers' mental models in two ways. First, the interface should use commonly accepted metaphors and make use of human pattern-recognition capabilities.…”
Section: Design Methodology For Scheduling Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%