2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9pp00451c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting cyanobacterial state transitions

Abstract: Critical evaluation of “new” and “old” models of cyanobacterial state transitions. Phycobilisome and membrane contributions to this mechanism are addressed. The signaling transduction pathway is discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
62
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
5
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The periods with excessive light are potentially harmful to photosynthetic proteins, pigments, and lipids due to the formation of ROS (Li et al, 2009). Therefore, there are several photoprotective and lightoptimizing processes (see, e.g., reviews for cyanobacteria; Kirilovsky et al, 2014;Calzadilla and Kirilovsky, 2020) that either dissipate excessive irradiation (non-photochemical quenching), regulate excitation energy distribution into/between photosystems (e.g., state transitions; McConnell et al, 2002;Kaňa et al, 2012;antenna decoupling;Kaňa et al, 2009;Tamary et al, 2012) or they cope with accelerated degradation of proteins in light (e.g., photoinhibition; Li et al, 2018). However, a functional link between the response of TM organization and fluctuations in light is still rather fragmented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The periods with excessive light are potentially harmful to photosynthetic proteins, pigments, and lipids due to the formation of ROS (Li et al, 2009). Therefore, there are several photoprotective and lightoptimizing processes (see, e.g., reviews for cyanobacteria; Kirilovsky et al, 2014;Calzadilla and Kirilovsky, 2020) that either dissipate excessive irradiation (non-photochemical quenching), regulate excitation energy distribution into/between photosystems (e.g., state transitions; McConnell et al, 2002;Kaňa et al, 2012;antenna decoupling;Kaňa et al, 2009;Tamary et al, 2012) or they cope with accelerated degradation of proteins in light (e.g., photoinhibition; Li et al, 2018). However, a functional link between the response of TM organization and fluctuations in light is still rather fragmented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, one could expect a similar effect of antenna protein mobilization during state transitions. The process regulates optimal redistribution of excitation energy flow from antennas either to PSI or to PSII [68,69]. In higher plants thylakoids, the redistribution could be allowed by a highly mobile fraction of LHCII antennae, which has been found by FCS in the stromal lamella of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii thylakoids (D LHCII = 0.92-2.13 µm 2 s −1 [47]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it has originally been proposed that PBS mobility is the main mechanism of state transitions in cyanobacteria [72]. However, the concept needs to be revised experimentally by further experiments (see discussion in [69]) due to the presence of PBS blinking [73] that has been shown to affect FRAP measurements of mobility in many fluorescent proteins [74,75] including GFP [76].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This debate arises from the conspicuous feature of the PBS to bind both PSII and PSI under different light regimes. There are two major hypotheses: the PBS mobile model and the PBS detachment model [58]. In the first model, the PBS remains bound to PSII under red light (State I), since red light preferentially excites PSII rather than PSI and triggers the downstream process of charge separation in the reaction centre [59].…”
Section: Pbs Functioning Under Different Light Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%