Revisiting Creeping Competences in the EU: The Case of Security R&amp;D Policy

Citi, Manuele

doi:10.1080/07036337.2013.813024

Cited by 21 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Komisja poszerzała swoje uprawnienia przy nadarzającej się okazji, m.in. pomagając organizować misje WPBiO 62 lub obsługując fundusze europejskie przeznaczone na badania rozwojowe mające zastosowanie w obronności 63 . Jej zachowanie na polu polityki obronnej odpowiada dwóm koncepcjom naukowym.…”

Section: Zarządzanie Wpbiounclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Pozatraktatowe metody rozwoju integracji: przykład Wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony

Grosse¹

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Celem artykułu jest zbadanie poza-traktatowych mechanizmów rozwoju Wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony. Autor stawia tezę, że odpowiadały za to dwa mechanizmy. Po pierwsze tzw. zróżnicowana integracja, czyli awangarda niektórych państw, która inicjowała postępy omawianej polityki. Po drugie była to ekspansja kompetencyjna Komisji Europejskiej i Europejskiego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości.

show abstract

Section: Zarządzanie Wpbiounclassified

“…Pierwsza wskazuje na zjawisko stopniowej ekspansji kompetencyjnej instytucji unijnych (ang. competences creep), a więc ewolucyjnym rozwoju polityk europejskich polegającym na przenoszeniu kolejnych uprawnień z poziomu narodowego na europejski 64 . Drugą jest koncepcja "ukierunkowanego oportunisty" (ang.…”

Section: Zarządzanie Wpbiounclassified

Pozatraktatowe metody rozwoju integracji: przykład Wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony

Grosse¹

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The move from intergovernmental to supranational integration in the area of defence equipment procurement could be regarded as a case of creeping competences. Previous studies consider that creeping competence in regulatory policy is caused by a functional spill over (Pollack 1994, Citi 2014). Differently, this paper argues that there was deliberate action from both the Commission and the member states in this move.…”

Section: Moving Beyond Intergovernmentalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sovereignty at stake? The European Commission's proposal for a Defence and Security Procurement Directive

Strikwerda

2016

European Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Defence and Security Procurement Directive (DSDP) is the first supranational policy in the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) and represents a departure from the standard understanding of the CSDP as intergovernmental. Whilst the member states were initially against such an initiative, the Defence Directive was eventually proposed in the Council in 2007 and accepted in July 2009. This paper examines why EU member states changed their position on the proposal for a Defence and Security Procurement Directive between 2004 and 2007. The analysis builds upon two hypotheses that aim to account for this change in position. Providing new insight into the views of the member states, the study finds that member states accepted the Directive due to a sense of obligation to respect internal market rules, and further discusses the theoretical implications of these findings.

show abstract

“…9 Generally, the studies tended to focus on the role of the EC and specific thematic programmes at the expense of discussing broader political and institutional factors. 6,10,11 The research questions that this paper addresses are as follows: why did the EU open the ERA to the world, what is the European added value (EAV) of international research intervening at the EU level, and how does international research cooperation contribute to European integration? These questions and the evidence provided in this paper may have important implications both for academic researchby deepening our understanding of integrationand for research policy and research organizations in Europe and worldwide, in particular for the countries participating in the INCO programmeby aiding them in designing more effective activities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Opening European Research to the World: Evidence from International Cooperation

Schmidt

2019

European Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, the European Union (EU) has intensified efforts to open European research programmes to the world. This paper focuses on the opening of European research to the world by studying the case of the FP7 international cooperation programme. It is based on a mixed-methods approach including analyses of quantitative data, documents and interviews with programme participants, policymakers and other stakeholders involved in 131 EU projects worldwide. The paper identifies features specific to the European international research cooperation scheme and contributes to our understanding of the supranational intervention and its impact on European research integration. Policymakers can use this piece of evidence to formulate enhanced strategies and better design and target activities both within the EU and globally, to achieve stronger, long-lasting research outcomes and effects.

show abstract

Revisiting Creeping Competences in the EU: The Case of Security R&D Policy

Cited by 21 publications

References 20 publications

Pozatraktatowe metody rozwoju integracji: przykład Wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony

Pozatraktatowe metody rozwoju integracji: przykład Wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony

Sovereignty at stake? The European Commission's proposal for a Defence and Security Procurement Directive

Opening European Research to the World: Evidence from International Cooperation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About