2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-014-2200-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Cognitive and Adaptive Functioning in Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Abstract: Profiles of performance on the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scales (SB5) and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) were examined in 73 children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. SB5 cognitive profiles were observed to be similar between participants with and without early language delay, but different between participants with and without intellectual disability. With few exceptions, the distribution and cognitive profiles of participants with specific nonverbal IQ-verbal IQ and abbreviated IQ-f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
32
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the ABIQ is to be used during early intervention for ASD, its practical advantages should be accompanied by robust evidence for its utility in estimating FSIQ. While a strong ABIQ‐FSIQ association was yielded in the SB5 standardization sample [Roid, ], the utility of the ABIQ in estimating FSIQ for young children with ASD remains unclear: two relevant studies did yield strong ABIQ‐FSIQ associations but both included adolescents as well as young children with ASD [Coolican et al, ; Matthews et al, ]. The current cross‐sectional study investigates the utility of the ABIQ in estimating FSIQ for young children with ASD, aged 3–5 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the ABIQ is to be used during early intervention for ASD, its practical advantages should be accompanied by robust evidence for its utility in estimating FSIQ. While a strong ABIQ‐FSIQ association was yielded in the SB5 standardization sample [Roid, ], the utility of the ABIQ in estimating FSIQ for young children with ASD remains unclear: two relevant studies did yield strong ABIQ‐FSIQ associations but both included adolescents as well as young children with ASD [Coolican et al, ; Matthews et al, ]. The current cross‐sectional study investigates the utility of the ABIQ in estimating FSIQ for young children with ASD, aged 3–5 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fifth edition of the Stanford‐Binet intelligence scales (SB5) encompasses a widely‐accepted and standardized test of cognitive ability; it principally assesses overall or ‘full scale’ IQ (FSIQ), as well as verbal and nonverbal IQ [Roid, ]. The SB5 was administered to a subsample of young children with ASD during its validation, and independently‐run studies provide additional support for its utility within this population [Coolican, Bryson, & Zwaigenbaum, ; Lennen, Lamb, Dunagan, & Hall, ; Matthews et al, ; Roid, ]. Young children with ASD often find it difficult to engage with cognitive assessments due to the considerable attentional and communicative demands involved [Kasari, Brady, Lord, & Tager‐Flusberg, ]; thus notable advantages of the SB5 include its use of child‐friendly toys that may help maintain attention, and its facilitation of the separate estimation of nonverbal and verbal IQ [Roid, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not considered a core feature of the disorder, most individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate impaired adaptive functioning [i.e., the age‐appropriate skills necessary to live independently; e.g., Kanne et al, ; Matthews et al, ; Szatmari et al, ]. Additionally, an ASD diagnosis requires that autism symptoms “[…] cause clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of current functioning” [American Psychiatric Association, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, DLS scores are often well below what would be expected for intellectually‐able individuals. Standard scores indicative of impairment relative to intellectual functioning have been repeatedly documented across domains on the Vineland [Kanne et al, ; Matthews et al, ; Mazefsky, Williams, & Minshew, ] as well as other measures [Kenworthy, Case, Harms, Martin, & Wallace, ]. Additionally, the gap between intellectual and adaptive functioning appears to increase with age [Kanne et al, ; Matthews et al, ; Perry et al, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation