2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2011.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting clientelism: A network analysis of problem-solving networks in Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we expect a similar pattern to obtain with regard to alternative hypotheses that focus on organized political and apolitical networks (Calvo & Murillo, 2013;Levitsky, 2003;Szwarcberg, 2012a). Individuals who tend to be joiners of formal civil society organizations (including political parties) are more likely to be targets, we suspect, partly because they are "movers and shakers" in their communities-people who wield some degree of informal interpersonal influence.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, we expect a similar pattern to obtain with regard to alternative hypotheses that focus on organized political and apolitical networks (Calvo & Murillo, 2013;Levitsky, 2003;Szwarcberg, 2012a). Individuals who tend to be joiners of formal civil society organizations (including political parties) are more likely to be targets, we suspect, partly because they are "movers and shakers" in their communities-people who wield some degree of informal interpersonal influence.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Among other labels, partisan networks are variously referred to as "problemsolving networks" (Auyero, 2000, p. 57; see also Levitsky, 2003;Nichter & Peress, 2014;Szwarcberg, 2012a), "a loyal network of supporters" (Hicken, 2011, p. 297), and, in Japan, kōenkai networks (Scheiner, 2006). Among other labels, partisan networks are variously referred to as "problemsolving networks" (Auyero, 2000, p. 57; see also Levitsky, 2003;Nichter & Peress, 2014;Szwarcberg, 2012a), "a loyal network of supporters" (Hicken, 2011, p. 297), and, in Japan, kōenkai networks (Scheiner, 2006).…”
Section: Authors' Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this form of politics, it is common practice that citizens rely on influential local brokers to solve day‐to‐day problems and then electorally reciprocate these services. Szwarcberg (, 231), for instance, defines “clientelism [as] a problem solving network where brokers solve voter problems by providing material and nonmaterial resources in exchange of political support.” Similarly, Stokes et al (2013, 106) underscore the importance of problem fixing in Argentina where one‐third of survey respondents say they would rely on an influential person if they were “facing a grave family problem related to a job or health,” while only 8% of the respondents say that they have received direct handouts from the brokers.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Así, instituciones como la iglesia protestante de Colindres, la agrupación de testigos de Jehová o Cáritas sirven como plataformas para la construcción de diferentes redes sociales a través de las cuales los jóvenes -sobre todo los de origen extranjero-comparten información sobre empleos, se apoyan en el cuidado de niños, se asesoran sobre diferentes trámites administrativos relacionados sobre todo con la adquisición de la nacionalidad española, o se prestan dinero (Szwarcberg, 2012). Merche describe nítidamente la formación de estas redes cuando le preguntamos por "las listas del pescado": "Si tú quieres trabajar, tú tienes que ir a esa empresa a apuntarte.…”
Section: El Primer Empleo Y Sucesivos: La Articulación De Las Decisiounclassified