2017
DOI: 10.5194/bg-2017-396
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll a + b as compared to previous methods

Abstract: Abstract. Chlorophyll concentrations of biological soil crust (biocrust) samples are commonly determined to quantify the 10 relevance of photosynthetically active organisms within these surface soil communities. Whereas chlorophyll extraction methods for freshwater algae and leaf tissues of vascular plants are well established, there is still some uncertainty regarding the optimal extraction method for biocrusts, where organism composition is highly variable and samples comprise major amounts of soil. In this … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The UV-vis spectrum of each sample was recorded, and the solution absorbance was measured at 665 nm, 649 nm, and 750 nm. The chlorophyll a and b contents were computed using the Ritchie’s equations: Ch-a = 13.5275 × (A 665 − A 750 ) − 5.201 × (A 649 − A 750 ) × f × S Ch-b = 22.4327 × (A 649 − A 750 ) − 7.0741 × (A 665 − A 750 ) × f × S where Ch-a—chlorophyll a in µg, Ch-b—chlorophyll b in µg, A—the solution absorbance at a certain wavelength, f—dilution factor, and S—volume of solvent (ethanol or ethanol–water = 4/1) [ 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UV-vis spectrum of each sample was recorded, and the solution absorbance was measured at 665 nm, 649 nm, and 750 nm. The chlorophyll a and b contents were computed using the Ritchie’s equations: Ch-a = 13.5275 × (A 665 − A 750 ) − 5.201 × (A 649 − A 750 ) × f × S Ch-b = 22.4327 × (A 649 − A 750 ) − 7.0741 × (A 665 − A 750 ) × f × S where Ch-a—chlorophyll a in µg, Ch-b—chlorophyll b in µg, A—the solution absorbance at a certain wavelength, f—dilution factor, and S—volume of solvent (ethanol or ethanol–water = 4/1) [ 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After finalization of the measurements, the biocrust fractions (photoautotrophic components and remaining substrate) were dried in an oven at 60°C and total dry weight was determined. Chlorophyll extraction was performed according to the method described by Caesar et al (2018; see supplement for methods description), but without intermediate shaking, using Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) plus a spatula tip of CaCO 3 to avoid acidification and concomitant phaeophytinization of chlorophyll (Ronen and Galun 1984). After spectrophotometry, the chlorophyll a (Chl a ) content was calculated according to Arnon et al 1974, whereas chlorophyll a + b (Chl a + b ) was determined according to Lange (pers.…”
Section: Sampling and Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…comm. ;Weber et al 2013;Caesar et al 2017). CO 2 gas exchange measurements in the field CO 2 gas exchange measurements in the field were performed at night, since daytime temperatures were too high and fluctuations were too large to allow measurements at a fixed temperature.…”
Section: Sampling and Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…031218). Microalgal powder was resuspended in DMSO, vortexed and sonicated for three times, allowing extraction of pigments [ 48 ]. All samples were manipulated in dark conditions and prepared a few minutes before treatments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%