2019
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting ‘brain modes’ in a new computational era: approaches for the characterization of brain-behavioural associations

Abstract: The study of brain-function relationships is undergoing a conceptual and methodological transformation due to the emergence of network neuroscience and the development of multivariate methods for lesion-deficit inferences. Anticipating this process, in 1998 Godefroy and co-workers conceptualized the potential of four elementary typologies of brain-behaviour relationships named ‘brain modes’ (unicity, equivalence, association, summation) as building blocks able to describe the association between intact or lesi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, using the MSA approach on mean disconnection values for each individual white matter bundle, we were unable to document situations in which similar deficits were induced by lesions on different locations along the trajectory of a bundle, thus to describe very common situations observed in clinical settings, whereby two separate lesions may give rise to the same deficit (see the so‐called “equivalence” brain‐mode reported by Godefroy et al () and revisited recently in Toba et al, ; see also Toba et al, ). This situation should be given particular attention in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, using the MSA approach on mean disconnection values for each individual white matter bundle, we were unable to document situations in which similar deficits were induced by lesions on different locations along the trajectory of a bundle, thus to describe very common situations observed in clinical settings, whereby two separate lesions may give rise to the same deficit (see the so‐called “equivalence” brain‐mode reported by Godefroy et al () and revisited recently in Toba et al, ; see also Toba et al, ). This situation should be given particular attention in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paradoxical lesion effects are intriguing functional phenomena that have attracted much attention and controversy [ 43 , 44 ]. How were paradoxical lesion effects produced in our example network?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on acute treatment or the pre-stroke level of stroke was furthermore not readily available for the entire cohort. As recommended in the literature, 62 we computed continuous values for region-wise lesion status (i.e., we calculated how many voxels were damaged per region), rather than applying a binarizing damage threshold. Nonetheless, we focused on a binary outcome – favorable versus unfavorable outcomes – and continuous, more granular and domain-specific outcome measures may facilitate even more detailed insights, as outlined above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%