Revisitation of Cycloheptatriene Derivatives as a Building Block for Various Substituted and Fused 1,6-Methano[10]annulenes and Substituted 4,9-Methanothia[11]annulenes
Abstract:Cl Cl Br Br Br Br 1 6 4 3 2 5 7 8 9 10 11 1 Scheme 1. Vogel's first method of synthesizing 1.Abstract: A synthetic maneuver from 1,6-diacetyl-and 1,6-diformyl-1,3,5-cycloheptatrienes toward various 1,6-methano[10]annulenes, such as diaryl-substituted, cyclobutene-annulated, and thiophene-annulated derivatives and its quinodimethane-type compound, and 4,9-methanothia[11]annulenes is spotlighted based on our recent research efforts. The crystal structure analysis of the annulenes, discussion of mechanistic detai… Show more
“…The PEC is still obtained in a SW+1S form where 2b is now 11.5 rather than 5.3 kcal/mol higher in energy than the annulene form at the potential minimum at R = 2.256 Å (X-ray: 2.235 Å). The corresponding Δ H (298) and Δ G (298) values are 10.2 and 10.3 kcal/mol, respectively, in line with experimental observations. − ,− ,− ,,, Clearly, 2 has to be considered as [10]annulene rather than a bicyclic, homoaromatic π-system because R = 2.256 Å is too large to lead to sizable through-space interactions …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The corresponding ΔH(298) and ΔG(298) values are 10.2 and 10.3 kcal/mol, respectively, in line with experimental observations. [24][25][26][27][29][30][31][33][34][35]37,47,48 Clearly, 2 has to be considered as [10]annulene rather than a bicyclic, homoaromatic π-system because R = 2.256 Å is too large to lead to sizable throughspace interactions. 10 These results show clearly that CCSD(T) and BD(T), although they may account for some nondynamical effects besides the dynamical electron correlation effects, fail to describe the TS region and 3b correctly, which can also be observed for 2b, as too much stability is assigned to the norcaradiene forms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target system 1 investigated in this work (see Figure ) belongs to the group of bridged [10]annulenes, the parent member of which, 1,6-methano[10]annulene ( 2 ), was first synthesized by Roth and Vogel in 1964 . Annulene 2 was experimentally characterized as an aromatic 10π-system fulfilling the Hückel 4 n + 2 rule, however with a distorted ring perimeter and a C1C6 distance R of 2.235 Å; , that is, it adopts structure 2a rather than that of the bisnorcaradiene (tricyclo[4.4.1.0 1,6 ]undeca-2,4,7,9-tetraene) form 2b (see Figure ), as was verified in dozens of experimental investigations − as well as computational investigations. ,− Therefore, it was an unexpected result when in the early 1970ies the 11,11-dimethyl derivative 1 , also synthesized by the Vogel group, was found to adopt according to X-ray diffraction studies a “tricyclic” structure with an R value close to 1.8 Å (1.827 and 1.771 due to 2 molecules in the unit cell) that speaks in favor of structure 1b rather than 1a . With the discovery that the corresponding 11-cyano-11-methyl derivative had similar R values and the dicyano derivative had even an R value of 1.558 Å, , the existence of a bisnorcaradiene form was fully confirmed.…”
Extensive quantum chemical calculations involving more than 20 different methods and including vibrational, temperature, entropic, and environmental corrections suggest that 11,11-dimethyl-1,6-methano[10]annulene (1) is characterized by a broad, asymmetric single well potential minimum in which the molecule can carry out a large-amplitude vibration. This result is obtained by using CASPT2(14,14) and CCSD(T) together with a VTZ basis set. The average R(C1C6) distance of 1 is close to 1.8 Å, in agreement with X-ray diffraction measurements. Lower level methods fail because a reliable account of the electronic structure of bridged annulenes requires a balanced description of nondynamical and dynamical electron correlation effects as well as a correct assessment of bridge-annulene interactions. An independent determination of the distance R using the mean deviation between the calculated and measured (13)C NMR chemical shifts of 1 leads to a value of 1.79 Å. By using electron density, energy density, and the local C1C6 stretching mode, it is demonstrated that the covalent bond ceases to exist at 1.695 Å and that for larger R values through-space homoaromatic interactions lead to some stabilization. The peculiar potential of 1 is shown to be a result of the interaction of the methyl groups with the perimeter CC bonds bisected by the symmetry plane of the molecule. CASPT2(14,14), CASPT2(10,10), CCSD(T), and BD(T) calculations were also used to provide for the first time reliable descriptions of the valence tautomeric potentials for the parent molecule, 1,6-methano[10]annulene (2), and the system 1,3,5-cycloheptatriene-norcardiene (3). In the latter case, calculations confirm a previous kinetic measurement of the free activation energy but correct NMR-based estimates. The methodology described can be applied to other annulenes and fullerenes.
“…The PEC is still obtained in a SW+1S form where 2b is now 11.5 rather than 5.3 kcal/mol higher in energy than the annulene form at the potential minimum at R = 2.256 Å (X-ray: 2.235 Å). The corresponding Δ H (298) and Δ G (298) values are 10.2 and 10.3 kcal/mol, respectively, in line with experimental observations. − ,− ,− ,,, Clearly, 2 has to be considered as [10]annulene rather than a bicyclic, homoaromatic π-system because R = 2.256 Å is too large to lead to sizable through-space interactions …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The corresponding ΔH(298) and ΔG(298) values are 10.2 and 10.3 kcal/mol, respectively, in line with experimental observations. [24][25][26][27][29][30][31][33][34][35]37,47,48 Clearly, 2 has to be considered as [10]annulene rather than a bicyclic, homoaromatic π-system because R = 2.256 Å is too large to lead to sizable throughspace interactions. 10 These results show clearly that CCSD(T) and BD(T), although they may account for some nondynamical effects besides the dynamical electron correlation effects, fail to describe the TS region and 3b correctly, which can also be observed for 2b, as too much stability is assigned to the norcaradiene forms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target system 1 investigated in this work (see Figure ) belongs to the group of bridged [10]annulenes, the parent member of which, 1,6-methano[10]annulene ( 2 ), was first synthesized by Roth and Vogel in 1964 . Annulene 2 was experimentally characterized as an aromatic 10π-system fulfilling the Hückel 4 n + 2 rule, however with a distorted ring perimeter and a C1C6 distance R of 2.235 Å; , that is, it adopts structure 2a rather than that of the bisnorcaradiene (tricyclo[4.4.1.0 1,6 ]undeca-2,4,7,9-tetraene) form 2b (see Figure ), as was verified in dozens of experimental investigations − as well as computational investigations. ,− Therefore, it was an unexpected result when in the early 1970ies the 11,11-dimethyl derivative 1 , also synthesized by the Vogel group, was found to adopt according to X-ray diffraction studies a “tricyclic” structure with an R value close to 1.8 Å (1.827 and 1.771 due to 2 molecules in the unit cell) that speaks in favor of structure 1b rather than 1a . With the discovery that the corresponding 11-cyano-11-methyl derivative had similar R values and the dicyano derivative had even an R value of 1.558 Å, , the existence of a bisnorcaradiene form was fully confirmed.…”
Extensive quantum chemical calculations involving more than 20 different methods and including vibrational, temperature, entropic, and environmental corrections suggest that 11,11-dimethyl-1,6-methano[10]annulene (1) is characterized by a broad, asymmetric single well potential minimum in which the molecule can carry out a large-amplitude vibration. This result is obtained by using CASPT2(14,14) and CCSD(T) together with a VTZ basis set. The average R(C1C6) distance of 1 is close to 1.8 Å, in agreement with X-ray diffraction measurements. Lower level methods fail because a reliable account of the electronic structure of bridged annulenes requires a balanced description of nondynamical and dynamical electron correlation effects as well as a correct assessment of bridge-annulene interactions. An independent determination of the distance R using the mean deviation between the calculated and measured (13)C NMR chemical shifts of 1 leads to a value of 1.79 Å. By using electron density, energy density, and the local C1C6 stretching mode, it is demonstrated that the covalent bond ceases to exist at 1.695 Å and that for larger R values through-space homoaromatic interactions lead to some stabilization. The peculiar potential of 1 is shown to be a result of the interaction of the methyl groups with the perimeter CC bonds bisected by the symmetry plane of the molecule. CASPT2(14,14), CASPT2(10,10), CCSD(T), and BD(T) calculations were also used to provide for the first time reliable descriptions of the valence tautomeric potentials for the parent molecule, 1,6-methano[10]annulene (2), and the system 1,3,5-cycloheptatriene-norcardiene (3). In the latter case, calculations confirm a previous kinetic measurement of the free activation energy but correct NMR-based estimates. The methodology described can be applied to other annulenes and fullerenes.
Triphenylphosphorane reagents 8 react with 1,3,5‐cycloheptatriene‐1,6‐dicarbaldehyde (2) under acidic as well as basic conditions to produce 1,6‐methano[10]annulene‐3,4‐dicarboximides 1 in moderate ‐to‐ good yields. The reagents 8 react with 3,4‐arene‐annulated 1,3,5‐cycloheptatriene‐1,6‐dicarbaldehydes 9, 10, and 11 to afford only the Wittig condensation products under acidic conditions but produce the arene‐annulated annulenedicarboximides under basic conditions. The structures of some of the dicarboximides and the intermediate Wittig condensation products were determined by X‐ray structural analysis. The emission properties of the dicarboximides were also studied.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.