2007
DOI: 10.3200/ctch.55.3.99-103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisioning Graduate Professional-Development Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption is that graduate students, having experienced higher education as undergraduates, understand how to navigate institutional bureaucracies, thus warranting less attention than current undergraduates. 6 Another issue is that graduate students have specific needs and face developmental challenges that may differ from, but are as important as, those experienced by undergraduates. While many academic departments provide some support for graduate students, they often suffer from a building-bound silo effect that isolates them from the larger university.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption is that graduate students, having experienced higher education as undergraduates, understand how to navigate institutional bureaucracies, thus warranting less attention than current undergraduates. 6 Another issue is that graduate students have specific needs and face developmental challenges that may differ from, but are as important as, those experienced by undergraduates. While many academic departments provide some support for graduate students, they often suffer from a building-bound silo effect that isolates them from the larger university.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elsewhere, Holaday, Weaver, and Nilson (2007) published an analysis of the elements that create a successful PDP; they assert that finding collaborative partners is one of the most important elements of securing a successful PDP. It has already been well established in prior research across well over two decades that successful PDPs possess institutional support, take into account participant evaluations, and offer training of relevance to their contingents (e.g., Birman, Desimore, Porter, & Garet, 2000;Guskey & Huberman, 1995;Norton, 2001;Richardson, 2000;Wood & Thompson, 1993).…”
Section: Context: Graduate Professional Development Programs At Canadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this goal, we have adapted the practical-based approach suggested in existing literature [6], which insists on using a systemic framework for educational programmes development; defines boundaries and possibilities for experiential learning approach implementation in higher education [7]; estimates measuring instruments for evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency of higher education [8]; provides the platform for life-long learning and efficient postgraduate performance [9]; evaluates tools for efficient education of undergraduate students [10]. Justified guidelines for master programs development were provided by Bellanca [11], who provided proof on the necessity to apply practical skills in the contemporary curriculum; Godinho and Schrimption [12], who outlined the importance of multidisciplinarity in building competences; and Parsons and Beauchamp [13], who developed an algorithm for competence building within a master course.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%