2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Infection Should Be Ruled Out in All Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we opted to grow cultures from aseptic cases for less than 2 weeks due to concerns of contaminant growth and thus overly inflated false-positive results. Second, several studies [11,17,20] have recently debated categorizing all aseptic revisions as truly aseptic, especially if there is positive intraoperative culture growth and subsequent need for rerevision due to infection. Although it is Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we opted to grow cultures from aseptic cases for less than 2 weeks due to concerns of contaminant growth and thus overly inflated false-positive results. Second, several studies [11,17,20] have recently debated categorizing all aseptic revisions as truly aseptic, especially if there is positive intraoperative culture growth and subsequent need for rerevision due to infection. Although it is Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study, which is an extension of a previous study and includes some patients previously reported on 17 , investigated the role that a novel pan-domain DNA-based amplification and analysis system, the Ibis T5000 biosensor (Isis Biosciences, Carlsbad, California [now a subsidiary of Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois]), may be able to play in improving the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. We determined how frequently the Ibis identified the same organism and resistance genes as conventional culture in patients undergoing revision arthroplasty, as well as how frequently it identified additional organisms or resistance genes not seen by conventional culture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die medizinisch bedeutsamste und innerhalb der ersten 2 Jahre häufigste Revisionsursache ist die PPI. Die Diagnose erscheint in der Praxis schwierig, da ein signifikanter Anteil von Lowgrade-Infektionen fälschlicherweise als aseptisch diagnostiziert wird [13]. Daher sollte bei jedem Patienten mit einer unklaren Schmerzsymptomatik bis zum Beweis des Gegenteils eine PPI angenommen werden.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified