“…However, some authors have demonstrated a trend of higher rates of aseptic loosening with more severe bone loss. [13] Subsidence has also been reported as a concern with mid-modular tapered stems [22][23][24] In this series, we had a very low rate of subsidence, as 96% of stems subsided less than 2mm and averaged 0.6 mm (range, 0-11 mm) for the entire cohort. Only one stem in our large series was revised due to mechanical loosening due to subsidence of 11mm.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[12,13] We feel that ensuring good bony contact around the proximal body at the mid-modular junction along with excellent diaphyseal fit can help to minimize this risk.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13] We report the mid-term results of survivorship and complications of patients who underwent revision THA with mid-modular cementless femoral stems.…”
“…However, some authors have demonstrated a trend of higher rates of aseptic loosening with more severe bone loss. [13] Subsidence has also been reported as a concern with mid-modular tapered stems [22][23][24] In this series, we had a very low rate of subsidence, as 96% of stems subsided less than 2mm and averaged 0.6 mm (range, 0-11 mm) for the entire cohort. Only one stem in our large series was revised due to mechanical loosening due to subsidence of 11mm.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[12,13] We feel that ensuring good bony contact around the proximal body at the mid-modular junction along with excellent diaphyseal fit can help to minimize this risk.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13] We report the mid-term results of survivorship and complications of patients who underwent revision THA with mid-modular cementless femoral stems.…”
“…Although this allows high concentration of antibiotics at the source of the infection, mechanical properties of cement are dampened, increasing risk of failure [40]. However, the experience with using fully cemented components for revisions in North America has been poor despite excellent results reported in Europe [41,42] with most high-volume revision surgeons routinely using cementless implants for their reconstructions and this has been among the factors that have led to a more limited use of a single-stage exchange [43,44].…”
“…There are published case series involving modular, distal t revision systems that have demonstrated a greater than 5-year mean survivorship with no reported modular failures, although host bone support of the modular junction is unclear [17][18][19][20]. We believe the increased strength at the proximal body-distal stem junction and the surgical technique to cover this junction with host bone may have contributed for the decrease in mechanical failures reported.…”
BackgroundContemporary uncemented femoral revision hip systems have become commonly used over the past decade and have enabled the reconstruction of leg length, offset and anteversionas independent variables through the use of modular junctions. Modular junction failures between the proximal body and distal stem have been described withrevision systems, although this is rare. We sought to identify the survivorship of one revision system in a salvage arthroplasty scenario where no host bone support of the modular junction was present.MethodsFrom a series of 136 patients, 15 patients (16 hips) were identified without host bone support of the modular junction with a mean radiological follow up of over 6 years(76 months +/- 35 months).ResultsThere have been no cases of prosthetic fracture over the follow-up duration, withtwo revisions performed for reasons of aseptic loosening and infection. The mean BMI of the study group was 30.2 with 78% of the cohort classified as overweight or obese.ConclusionIt is well recognised that, host bone support of the modular junction is preferable, however the satisfactory outcomes over the midterm in these complex patients suggests that modular revision systems remain an option.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.