The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Modular Cementless Femoral Stem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some authors have demonstrated a trend of higher rates of aseptic loosening with more severe bone loss. [13] Subsidence has also been reported as a concern with mid-modular tapered stems [22][23][24] In this series, we had a very low rate of subsidence, as 96% of stems subsided less than 2mm and averaged 0.6 mm (range, 0-11 mm) for the entire cohort. Only one stem in our large series was revised due to mechanical loosening due to subsidence of 11mm.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, some authors have demonstrated a trend of higher rates of aseptic loosening with more severe bone loss. [13] Subsidence has also been reported as a concern with mid-modular tapered stems [22][23][24] In this series, we had a very low rate of subsidence, as 96% of stems subsided less than 2mm and averaged 0.6 mm (range, 0-11 mm) for the entire cohort. Only one stem in our large series was revised due to mechanical loosening due to subsidence of 11mm.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[12,13] We feel that ensuring good bony contact around the proximal body at the mid-modular junction along with excellent diaphyseal fit can help to minimize this risk.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this allows high concentration of antibiotics at the source of the infection, mechanical properties of cement are dampened, increasing risk of failure [40]. However, the experience with using fully cemented components for revisions in North America has been poor despite excellent results reported in Europe [41,42] with most high-volume revision surgeons routinely using cementless implants for their reconstructions and this has been among the factors that have led to a more limited use of a single-stage exchange [43,44].…”
Section: Single-stage Exchange Arthroplastymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are published case series involving modular, distal t revision systems that have demonstrated a greater than 5-year mean survivorship with no reported modular failures, although host bone support of the modular junction is unclear [17][18][19][20]. We believe the increased strength at the proximal body-distal stem junction and the surgical technique to cover this junction with host bone may have contributed for the decrease in mechanical failures reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%