2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-019-3669-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision of the species composition and distribution of Turkish sand flies using DNA barcodes

Abstract: Background Currently, knowledge regarding the phlebotomine sand fly (Diptera: Psychodidae) fauna of Turkey is restricted to regions with endemic leishmaniasis. However, rapidly changing environmental and social conditions highlight concerns on the possible future expansion of sand fly-borne diseases in Turkey, promoting risk assessment through biosurveillance activities in non-endemic regions. Traditional morphological approaches are complicated by extensive cryptic speciation in sand flies, thus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(93 reference statements)
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( Adlerius ) and P. longiductus in highly diverged lineages (Fig. 4 ), and the mean K2P distance between these two lineages (6.5%) was comparable to those previously reported for different sand fly species classified in the subgenus Adlerius (Erisoz Kasap et al [ 26 ]). These results are further corroborated by parsimony network analysis which identified two independent networks for these two lineages, suggesting they may represent two different species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( Adlerius ) and P. longiductus in highly diverged lineages (Fig. 4 ), and the mean K2P distance between these two lineages (6.5%) was comparable to those previously reported for different sand fly species classified in the subgenus Adlerius (Erisoz Kasap et al [ 26 ]). These results are further corroborated by parsimony network analysis which identified two independent networks for these two lineages, suggesting they may represent two different species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…With respect to the geography of Moldova and adjacent regions that lack natural barriers of dispersal, we may expect a rather unrestricted gene flow with populations from neighboring countries. The very low mean intraspecific K2P distance (0.02%) obtained for P. papatasi specimens collected from Moldova was comparable with those previously reported from Greece, Cyprus [ 10 ] and Turkey (Erisoz Kasap et al [ 26 ]) and further supports the conclusion that Moldovan P. papatasi comprise genetically close populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Ph. simici is frequently reported in Balkan [ 25 28 ] and Middle Eastern countries [ 29 , 30 ]. Recent reports from North Macedonia (V. Dvořák, verbal communication), Kosovo [ 31 ] and Serbia [ 32 ] point towards a northward European distribution, which is further corroborated by an older mention from Croatia [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have investigated the genetic structure of 10 populations collected from both endemic and non-endemic areas for zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis using the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I ( Cox1 or COI ) as molecular marker to gather clues on the influence of the Atlas Mountains on the evolutionary history of P. papatasi populations in Morocco. The cytochrome c oxidase gene is used as a DNA barcode to guide the identification of new animal species and to delineate cryptic taxon and the association between their life stages [ 44 , 45 , 46 ]. The sequence polymorphism at this locus has been used to investigate the population genetic structure of Lutzomyia longipalpis [ 47 ], and to discriminate L. umbratilis sibling species [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%