2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10764-006-9036-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision of the Mouse Lemurs (Microcebus) of Eastern Madagascar

Abstract: Phylogenetic analysis of ca. 4500 base pairs of mitochondrial DNA sequence data reveals further genetic diversity in mouse lemurs (Microcebus) on the eastern and western coasts of Madagascar. Molecular data and phylogenetic analyses revise the previously monotypic species of eastern Madagascar, Microcebus rufus, with the description of 3 new species. Three additional Microcebus species are proposed in eastern Madagascar, along with another Microcebus species in western Madagascar. Correlating the molecular dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
111
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But what of M. jollyae, M. simmonsi, M. mittermeieri, M. rufus, and M. mamiratra, which might, on the basis of recorded localities, be viewed as local intraspecific variants? This conclusion would be hard to square in detail with the phylograms presented by Louis et al 27 , but the quantitative analyses are not inordinately robust. Moreover, the fact that the question can be legitimately asked is a good indication that we will need to know a great deal more about the mouse lemurs before we can derive anything approaching a definitive account of the hierarchy of diversity in Microcebus, a point that Louis et al 27 emphasize.…”
Section: Genus Microcebusmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…But what of M. jollyae, M. simmonsi, M. mittermeieri, M. rufus, and M. mamiratra, which might, on the basis of recorded localities, be viewed as local intraspecific variants? This conclusion would be hard to square in detail with the phylograms presented by Louis et al 27 , but the quantitative analyses are not inordinately robust. Moreover, the fact that the question can be legitimately asked is a good indication that we will need to know a great deal more about the mouse lemurs before we can derive anything approaching a definitive account of the hierarchy of diversity in Microcebus, a point that Louis et al 27 emphasize.…”
Section: Genus Microcebusmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This conclusion would be hard to square in detail with the phylograms presented by Louis et al 27 , but the quantitative analyses are not inordinately robust. Moreover, the fact that the question can be legitimately asked is a good indication that we will need to know a great deal more about the mouse lemurs before we can derive anything approaching a definitive account of the hierarchy of diversity in Microcebus, a point that Louis et al 27 emphasize. Nonetheless, at least a significant part of the recent increase in mouse lemur species seems justified by available facts.…”
Section: Genus Microcebusmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations