1971
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.2567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision of the genus Morganella (Lycoperdaceae)

Abstract: Fructifications epigeous, 1-3 cm. in diameter, depressed-globose to turbinate; peridium double; exoperidium velutinous, furfuraceous, granular, tuberculose or spinulose, whitish, tan, flesh-colored, or deep red-brown to purplish-black; endoperidium papery above, thickened below, flaccid, smooth or reticulate, mouth irregular, apical; gleba pulverulent, without a true capillitium, paracapillitium abundant, glebal membranes abundant, pseudocolumella sometimes present, these elements all strongly cyanophilous; su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar characteristic between these 2 species are the basidiospores (Figure 3) (Cunningham, 1926(Cunningham, , 1944, which display the same ornamentation pattern in scanning electron microscopy ( Figure 4). Other closely-related species, such as Morganella afra Kreisel & Dring, differ from Morganella arenicola in their endoperidium, which is areolate in the former, and in the occurrence of only the paracapillitium (Kreisel and Dring, 1967 close to M. arenicola, differs in its reticulate endoperidium and an irregular apical pore (Cunningham, 1944;Ponce de Leon, 1971), which is well defined in M. arenicola ( Figure 2). Morganella arenicola exhibits eucapillitium (Figure 3) as in Morganella pyriformis (Schaeff.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A similar characteristic between these 2 species are the basidiospores (Figure 3) (Cunningham, 1926(Cunningham, , 1944, which display the same ornamentation pattern in scanning electron microscopy ( Figure 4). Other closely-related species, such as Morganella afra Kreisel & Dring, differ from Morganella arenicola in their endoperidium, which is areolate in the former, and in the occurrence of only the paracapillitium (Kreisel and Dring, 1967 close to M. arenicola, differs in its reticulate endoperidium and an irregular apical pore (Cunningham, 1944;Ponce de Leon, 1971), which is well defined in M. arenicola ( Figure 2). Morganella arenicola exhibits eucapillitium (Figure 3) as in Morganella pyriformis (Schaeff.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the aim of carrying out a comparative study, the holotype of Morganella compacta, from the New Zealand Fungal and Plant Disease Collection (PDD), was used. Macroscopic and microscopic analyses were conducted according to the literature (Zeller, 1948;Kreisel and Dring, 1967;Ponce de Leon, 1971;Suárez and Wright, 1996). Micromorphological dates were observed after rehydration in 5% KOH and/or with the aid of Melzer's reagent (Asef and Muradov, 2012;Kumari et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…in 1948 and since then has been sporadically studied by a number of taxonomists such as Kreisel & Dring (1967), Ponce de León (1971), Morales et al (1974) and more recently by Suarez & Wright (1996), Krüger & Kreisel (2003), and Cortez et al (2007). According to Kreisel & Dring (1967) it has a similar distribution pattern to that of the genus Bovista Pers., with worldwide occurrence, although most of the species are only known from the neotropical zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%