2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision of the Failed Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in concordance with two other papers, where the rate of reoperation has been stipulated to be 2-3 % (Cooney et al, 2006;Megerle et al, 2011), but the article does not discuss in detail the difficulties involved in addressing failed trapeziectomies surgically. This surgery is highly challenging and the results are unpredictable with success rates quoted from 20-84 % (Cooney et al, 2006;Megerle et al, 2011;Papatheodorou et al, 2017;Sadhu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Trapeziectomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in concordance with two other papers, where the rate of reoperation has been stipulated to be 2-3 % (Cooney et al, 2006;Megerle et al, 2011), but the article does not discuss in detail the difficulties involved in addressing failed trapeziectomies surgically. This surgery is highly challenging and the results are unpredictable with success rates quoted from 20-84 % (Cooney et al, 2006;Megerle et al, 2011;Papatheodorou et al, 2017;Sadhu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Trapeziectomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the decision making for each revision procedure, other factors, such as the type of primary surgery, previous revisions, condition of the affected tissues and adjacent joints, play a role. Apart from our recommendations, other authors suggest different revision techniques, such as the use of the abductor pollicis longus tendon (Mattila and Waris, 2019; Megerle et al., 2011), distraction pinning with soft tissue interposition (Papatheodorou et al., 2017), implant arthroplasty (Ledoux, 2021; Umarji et al., 2012) or thumb MC to index MC arthrodesis (Ledoux, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various techniques for revision surgery have been reported and include soft tissue interposition, implant arthroplasty or soft tissue interposition and distraction pinning (Cooney et al., 2006; Knak and Hansen, 2016; Munns et al., 2019; Papatheodorou et al., 2017). Only a few studies have investigated thumb CMC revision surgery and shown satisfactory outcomes; 50% to 75% of patients undergoing this procedure can expect good results (Cooney et al., 2006; Munns et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty with resection of the trapezium and soft tissue interposition, with or without ligament reconstruction, has historically proven to be an efficacious treatment for thumb CMC arthritis 1–4. The incidence of failure following primary thumb CMC arthroplasty is low, with rates of revision surgery ranging from 2.5 to 2.9% at long-term follow-up 2,5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%