1996
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199605000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision of the Acetabular Component of a Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Massive Structural Allograft. Study with a Minimum Five-Year Follow-up*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
92
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
92
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The survivorship of revision cementless acetabular components and roof/reconstruction rings in this series was similar. The latter is comparable with other series and all diagnoses (42%-87% at 5-10 years followup) [10,28,33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The survivorship of revision cementless acetabular components and roof/reconstruction rings in this series was similar. The latter is comparable with other series and all diagnoses (42%-87% at 5-10 years followup) [10,28,33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Compared to other studies [7,8,9,17,20,21] we had nearly twice as many women, and our patient population was almost 10 years older. Recent papers [24,25,26] have, however, patient groups comparable to ours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The results of minor column defects (\ 50% of implanted component supported by graft) indicate that survivorship of 80% at a mean followup of 10 years with aseptic loosening as the endpoint may be achieved [42], falling to 55% at 20 years [22]. When a major column graft is used (typically when [ 50% of the implanted component is supported by graft), survivorship of 55% at a mean followup of 7 years has been shown [14]. The use of bilobed acetabular components has been associated with failure rates of 24% at a mean followup of less than 4 years [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%