1981
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198111000-00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision of Mueller Total Hip Arthroplasties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In revising a conventional total hip a high incidence of complications is often reported, e.g. perforation of the femoral shaft, fracture of the femoral shaft or perforation of the acetabulum [6,15,23]. The postoperative infectioin rate after revision of hip prostheses is also higher in cases with a conventional total hip compared to cases with a resurfacing prosthesis et al [3,26,29,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In revising a conventional total hip a high incidence of complications is often reported, e.g. perforation of the femoral shaft, fracture of the femoral shaft or perforation of the acetabulum [6,15,23]. The postoperative infectioin rate after revision of hip prostheses is also higher in cases with a conventional total hip compared to cases with a resurfacing prosthesis et al [3,26,29,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice, these procedures have proven successful , Hoogland et al 1981 and there is no doubt that the bonding strength of the cement is improved by these measures (Oh et al 1978). In our opinion medullary plugging and the use of a cement gun can be recommended to improve the cement mantle, but we are more reluctant to recommend pressurizing until studies on possibly adverse effects on bone remodelling have been completed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instability after revision THA via the posterior approach has been reported up to 15% in the literature [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32]. Alberton et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%