2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision Hip Arthroscopy After Labral Reconstruction Using Iliotibial Band Autograft: Surgical Findings and Comparison of Outcomes With Labral Reconstructions Not Requiring Revision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether this association was related to the low impact of stationary cycling, inhibition of joint adhesions from motion restoration, or other factors requires further study. 9 , 17 , 18 , 35 , 37 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether this association was related to the low impact of stationary cycling, inhibition of joint adhesions from motion restoration, or other factors requires further study. 9 , 17 , 18 , 35 , 37 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical outcomes seem poorer after labral resection compared to labral preservation, but no sound evidence is available to date, notably regarding circumferential labral resection [39][40][41]. Labral reconstruction using an autologous tendon graft can be considered to restore fluid sealing, although graft outcomes, particularly in terms of the risk of ossification, remain unclear [42].…”
Section: Open Surgical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our patient population differs from several other labral reconstruction study cohorts in that we report a population with high rates of acetabular microfracture (29%), Tönnis grade 1 (22.6%) and high grade (grades 3–4) acetabular cartilage damage (49%) [ 16 , 26 , 36 , 37 ]. This finding suggests patients with irreparable labral damage requiring labrum reconstruction may be more likely to have high grade cartilage damage, but controlled, comparative studies comparing labral reconstruction with debridement/repair are needed to answer this question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%