2013
DOI: 10.5094/apr.2013.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revising the use of potassium (K) in the source apportionment of PM2.5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such behaviour most likely reflects contributions from biomass burning over the entire year (Schmidl et al, 2008;Pachon et al, 2013). For both Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ ions, clear monomodal mass distributions with maxima in the 1.6 to 2.39 µm size range were observed over the investigated period.…”
Section: Relative Ionic Contribution In Size-resolved Aerosolmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Such behaviour most likely reflects contributions from biomass burning over the entire year (Schmidl et al, 2008;Pachon et al, 2013). For both Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ ions, clear monomodal mass distributions with maxima in the 1.6 to 2.39 µm size range were observed over the investigated period.…”
Section: Relative Ionic Contribution In Size-resolved Aerosolmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…United States emission inventories of PM 2.5 trace elements revealed that agricultural soil and unpaved road dust emit much larger quantities of Ba on a national basis (Reff et al, 2009). K was involved in F2 as it consists in dust as well (Pachon et al, 2013). F3 was defined as charcoal burning with moderate Cr, Rb, and K loadings.…”
Section: Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As levoglucosan concentrations were not measured in this study, biomass burning emissions -which include contributions from pellet and wood heating, agricultural activities and forest fires -were characterised by other inorganic elements/compounds, mainly potassium salts (KCl, K 2 SO 4 and KNO 3 ), metals (Zn, Pb) and refractory compounds including Ca, Mg and Si. Actually, the use of K could be disadvantageous because it has multiple source emissions (Pachon et al, 2013) and the availability of levoglucosan could have been more helpful to better resolve the contributions from biomass burning reducing the interference from other sources. Since K emitted from biomass burning is water-soluble while K from mineral dust is not, the K + ion water-soluble fraction measured by ion chromatography (IC) could represent a suitable marker for biomass burning emissions especially in fine aerosol fractions (Reche et al, 2012).…”
Section: Base Run Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%