2023
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/acbdf9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revising Properties of Planet–Host Binary Systems. III. There Is No Observed Radius Gap for Kepler Planets in Binary Star Systems*  

Abstract: Binary stars are ubiquitous; the majority of solar-type stars exist in binaries. Exoplanet occurrence rate is suppressed in binaries, but some multiples do still host planets. Binaries cause observational biases in planet parameters, with undetected multiplicity causing transiting planets to appear smaller than they truly are. We have analyzed the properties of a sample of 119 planet-host binary stars from the Kepler mission to study the underlying population of planets in binaries that fall in and around the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 88 publications
(125 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although one-third of nearby solar-type stars have at least one companion (Raghavan et al 2010), the effects of stellar multiplicity on planetary architecture and orbital dynamics are still poorly understood. In addition, unknown stellar companions can cause inaccuracy in estimating planet radius by diluting the measured transit depths (Furlan et al 2017;Teske et al 2018;Sullivan et al 2023). Planet properties may also be inaccurate if the planet is actually orbiting the secondary star.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although one-third of nearby solar-type stars have at least one companion (Raghavan et al 2010), the effects of stellar multiplicity on planetary architecture and orbital dynamics are still poorly understood. In addition, unknown stellar companions can cause inaccuracy in estimating planet radius by diluting the measured transit depths (Furlan et al 2017;Teske et al 2018;Sullivan et al 2023). Planet properties may also be inaccurate if the planet is actually orbiting the secondary star.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%